Saturday, December 21, 2013

Family matters

As we approach year's end, we here at The Umbrellahead Review can't help but sympathize with all those poor souls who struggle with discord and strife in their households over the holiday season. Even in today's consumer-centric world, a happy family surely isn't something you can buy in a store or order at a restaurant, and it can be a difficult journey indeed to restore domestic tranquility to a troubled home.

And so, too, the protagonists of these movies, all three of whom find themselves at odds with their fathers (or fathers-in-law). Can a non-Oedipal solution be found to bring peace and harmony to the unhappy home?



Vulcan, Son of Jupiter (1962)
(aka Vulcan, figlio di Giove)

Objective Grade: D-
Bouncy-Bouncy and/or Beefcake Bonus: B+



Pity poor Vulcan (Iloosh Khoshabe, here billed under the amazing pseudonym of "Rod Flash Ilush"). All he wants to do is make weapons and armor in his smithy and be left alone, but the other gods have different plans.

Most pressingly, they need to find a husband for Venus (Annie Gorassini), an attention-seeking troublemaker whose pastimes include making out with good-looking guys, flaunting her assets in public, and hanging out with Nicole Richie.



The two best candidates are Vulcan and hotheaded Mars (Roger Browne), but the latter is far more smitten with Venus's charms. Mars jealously picks a fight with Vulcan in his smithy, as a consequence of which -- "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" -- they're both temporarily banished to Earth.



This is fine with Mars, who schemes to depose Jupiter with the aid of King Milos of Thrace (Ugo Sabetta). They plan to build a Tower of Babel-like structure to reach the gods in their heavens, and hopefully get to whip some slaves along the way.



For Vulcan it's rather more inconvenient. On arrival he's wakened from unconsciousness by a group of Neptune's nymphs, but all are soon captured by an armada of dentally 'n' mentally challenged lizard-men.



These outcasts, cursed by the gods, relish the chance to get some revenge by imprisoning and torturing Vulcan. However, help comes in the form of the reluctant Geo (Salvatore Furnari), whom the nymphs are able to sneak out in a bundle of hay.



Once free, Geo blows a conch shell to summon a Triton, who drags him to the undersea kingdom of Neptune (Omero Gargano), kicking and screaming the whole time -- which is pretty much how Geo spends 90% of the film, at that.



Help is soon sent, and once the lizard-men are dispatched, everyone goes to visit Neptune, where Mercury brings news of Mars's plans. Vulcan vows to stop him, but not before enjoying a sexy, sexy dance from nymph Aetna (Bella Cortez), whose pendulous assets would put many Holsteins to shame.


("Pit bulls are just so misunderstood, you know?")

Meanwhile, Venus is bored with all this talk of war, and yearns for the simple life -- that is, the one where everyone constantly pays attention to her, despite the fact that she does nothing worthwhile at all. So she finds her own ways to cause trouble.


("Aetna knows what she did, and that's all I'm ever going to say about it.")

You can probably guess the rest: swordfights, impassioned speeches of love, bouncing bazoombas, cornball dialogue, and alas, the bald guy gets it.

Not the bald guy!

Of course it's all utterly, wonderfully ridiculous, with poor acting, gloriously misguided dubbing (an unequivocal plus in a film like this), and fight scene choreography that's akin to assisted cartwheel practice in grade-school gym class. There's plenty of firm and/or jiggling flesh on display if you like that sort of thing -- even middle-aged dwarf-flesh, offering a welcome opportunity for those curious souls who don't want to clutter up their browser search history. And while Mill Creek's print is far from pristine, with washed-out colors that vary wildly even within a single shot (and a perennial red line on the right-hand edge of the frame), it's still more than watchable. 

So why not let Vulcan, Son of Jupiter be your companion for one of these lonely nights? It may not feed your head, but if someone denies the entertainment value in such a spectacle, we'll raise our heads in indignation and shout: "It's not right!" 

("Well, I'm trying to get up that great big hill of hope.")


The Man with Two Lives (1942)

Grade: C-



Sometimes men wear tuxedos and bow ties. These are usually good men, like Philip Bennett (Edward Norris), one of two sons of wealthy Hobart Bennett (Frederick Burton), and his brother Reg (Tom Seidel), who bears a vague resemblance to Anna Paquin.



Other good men in The Man with Two Lives include family friend Dr. Richard Clark (Edward Keane), who's in the midst of conducting a series of highly successful experiments in reviving the organs of dead animals. He has big plans to start human trials, and conveniently, there's a convicted murderer due for execution that very night...at midnight. (Haven't you ever seen The Indestructible Man, bud?)



And then there's Professor Toller (Hugh Sothern), a buzzkill who keeps hinting that these experiments might be meddling with God's domain, and is particularly fond of talking about the transmigration of souls.



Well, there's an engagement party, a shocking turn of events, an unexpected tragedy, and a few suspenseful shots of a clock. Always a bad sign, that one.



Bottom line, Philip wakes up, and now he's wearing a necktie. And a hat. This can't be good.



"Surely," he says to himself, "I need some outside help on this." He seeks out Marcia Gay Harden, but since she hasn't been born yet, instinct directs him to Sporady's, a magical Irish bar that has a roughly 68% chance of existing on any given night.



Here he finds the next best option, Helen Lengel (Marlo Dwyer), a local specialist in funny hats with a heart of gold.


(I mean, she has the heart of gold, since you can't really wear a gold-hearted hat without hurting your neck.)

She suggests that he return home and consult his fiancée, Louise (Eleanor Lawson), and even provides a funny hat for her on the house. The results aren't good, however.



Having enraged his father, he returns to Sporady's (which luckily happens to exist) and barges in on a roomful of gangsters in a desperate attempt to find a new foster father. They're sympathetic, but deeply uncomfortable with both the form and content of his request, and encourage him to find other ways to resolve the situation.



Ultimately Philip and his dad come to terms when they discover that Reg is deeply in love with his fiancée. Together, as father and son, they beat the younger brother to death, affording them a much-needed opportunity to reconnect -- and conveniently simplifying the wedding plans, since Louise didn't have a good candidate for maid of honor.

In the closing scenes, local policeman Lt. Bradley (Addison Richards), a compulsive eater, is discovered in the final stages of consuming the couple's entire wedding cake. "We never should have trusted that necktie-wearing bastard," says the ensemble in unison, before promptly descending upon the hapless cop. After asphyxiating him on the remaining cake and severing his man-parts, they throw his body into the Seine, in a beautifully choreographed scene set to the strains of the Moonlight Sonata.



If you're wondering how all this could've passed the Hays Code, never fear, disaster is averted: at the last minute, we learn that practically everything since the engagement party was all a dream.

So all the asphyxiating, hat-wearing, and sibling-beating? None of that was true, none of it happened. And if you feel cheated, well, so did we -- but hopefully it was entertaining while it lasted.



Scared to Death (1947)

Objective Grade: F
Hungarian Hue Honorarium: D



This, friends, is the protagonist of Scared to Death, one Laura Van Ee (Molly Lamont). She spends most of the film with rage, fear, and contempt etched on her face, fulminating with hatred of her husband and father-in-law (and they're none too fond of her either), with whom she lives in a spooky old house -- and whom she suspects of wanting to kill her.

But when we first see her, she looks more like this:



No spoiler, that, since it's how the film starts: with Ms. Van Ee on a slab in the morgue, and two coroners about to go to work on her.

As they prepare to undertake (!) their gruesome necessities, they note that "one hates to perform an autopsy on a beautiful girl", leaving us to wonder whether they're lamenting the death of someone attractive -- always more tragic than when ugly people get snuffed, as is well-known -- or whether they're simply sad to spoil an aesthetically pleasing object which would otherwise offer intriguing possibilities.



Either way, it's probably the only genuinely creepy bit in the film. But before they start carvin', they pause once more to speculate about her final moments:

"And yet...one often wonders: what could have caused the last thought that was cut off by death?"



Well, Scared to Death is here to tell us. Thanks to the magic of corpse narration, the whole film is recounted from Mrs. Van Ee's point of view, more or less, tracing her descent into paranoia as her mysterious persecutor draws the noose tighter and tighter.



While this is a clever gambit in principle (put your pants back on, Nacho), in practice it means that, every 10 minutes or so, the film is suddenly interrupted by the following sequence:
  • a still shot of the corpse that fades in, underscored by "woo-woo" spooky music that amounts to a wordless vocalise and a couple of augmented chords;
  • Molly Lamont delivers a line or two in voiceover, usually meaningless expository filler in the White Gorilla "As I watched..." vein;
  • and the shot fades back out, accompanied by the same musical cue.
We don't know how this was received in 1947, but nowadays it reads as a dead ringer for a loading screen from a 1990s CDROM game. Just add a progress bar, a few two-color icons, and a bonus preview for Wand of Gamelon, and you're there.



These cornball tactics are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Scared to Death's problems, as many factors sink it beyond all hope of redemption. Despite a few vague signs of greater ambition, the plot is incoherent, full of red herrings and loose ends, and generally feels like it was being made up as the filming went along. Characters' motivations are unclear, their behavior often makes no sense, and none are remotely sympathetic. And the final twist, revealing the culprit at last, amounts to a cheap trick that doesn't even play fair.



Then you've got Nat Pendleton as Bill "Bull" Raymond, a disgraced cop turned private investigator who inserts himself into proceedings in hopes of redemption. The relentless "comic" patter of this bumbling idiot is like nails on a chalkboard, and it's hard to imagine any of his one-liners eliciting anything but a groan and a sad shake of the head, even in 1947.



The film's one saving grace is Béla Lugosi as Professor Leonide, an enigmatic mesmerist and cousin of the elder Van Ee (George Zucco). In the midst of all this domestic turmoil, he arrives unexpectedly in the company of his diminutive manservant Indigo (Angelo Rossitto), though his visit isn't exactly welcome.



Lugosi's performance is exactly what you'd expect, but allows for a bit more range and playfulness than most of the pseudo-Drac dreck he slogged through in the last decades of his career. Genteel, urbane, but unequivocally dangerous, he easily steals every scene he's in.



And, as every review on the Internet notes, this movie is your only chance to see Lugosi in color. At least in Mill Creek's print, the film uses a funky, not-quite-right palette that initially made us suspect it was one of Ted Turner's misguided colorization efforts. But nope, it's every inch the real thing.


("Really, you met Milton Berle?")

But let's be clear, Scared to Death is an utterly regrettable movie with absolutely nothing else to offer save Béla's presence. If seeing him is enough to please you, by all means; otherwise, steer very clear of this abrasive, half-assed trainwreck.


(Nice tie, too.)

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Now you see it, now you don't

Or, really, the other way around.

(Including this entry, which was written in October but is only making its way to you now...waiting this whole time in our draft box, out of sight.)



The Phantom of Soho (1964)

Grade: C



Seamy and stabby, this Teutonic tale of maritime mayhem and razor-edged revenge is really more of a police procedural than a horror movie. And there's a dash of FPS in there, too.



A string of murders in Soho, or the mit Sauerkraut version thereof, attracts the attention of Scotland Yard's finest. It would seem in everyone's best interest to crack the case, and the local underworld certainly doesn't welcome the police attention...

...but no one's eager to talk.



The elusive perpetrator -- from whom the film takes its title -- is a cipher to all but a few, who begin to suspect that a crime they committed long ago has come back to haunt them.



The case also piques the curiosity of Clarinda Smith (Barbara Rütting), an author who specializes in lurid crime novels. The spunky Ms. Smith soon takes a personal interest in the proceedings, aiming to penetrate to the heart of these foul deeds -- as fodder for her next book, naturally.

It doesn't hurt that she's a very close friend of the head of Scotland Yard (Hans Söhnker), though neither he nor his appointed investigator, Chief Inspector Hugh Patton (Dieter Borsche), are too happy about her preternatural ability to keep one step ahead of them -- and everyone else.



Whoever put together the English-language script had some fun with it, as the dialogue is uncommonly tight for a dubbed film; no doubt it helped that The Phantom of Soho is based on a book.

And if you like to see older gentlemen hit on attractive, half-naked 1960s chicks? Well, it's got that too, though their wares will only occupy about half of your screen thanks to Mill Creek's bizarro pseudo-letterboxing.



But ultimately this Crimi is little more than a glorified Agatha Christie story. There's little to complain about, but little that sticks in the mind afterward. And unlike Christie, here the plot isn't convincing enough to pull off that pleasant suspension of belief that makes a good mystery.

So instead, it's mainly a matter of pointy things. And also knives.





The Sound of Horror (1966)

Grade: D+



We'd say "A group of treasure hunters gets more than they bargained for", but treasure hunters don't really bargain, do they? I mean, the idea is to find treasure, not to somehow transact for it. You don't make a proposition to the chest, unless you're P.'s high school social studies teacher (who made many such propositions, silently at least).



Anyway, we're in "Greece", there's a bit of pick-axing and dynamiting, and before you know it our merry band of bargain-hunters is under siege from an invisible foe. If this makes it sound a bit like Predator, well, kind of -- but with less Arnold and more dance scenes.



A bit of judicious editing would've done The Sound of Horror a world of good, if by "world" one means "significant, but insufficient for salvation". The cast is OK, the concept reasonable, but the movie has an almost suicidal compulsion to bring itself to a screeching halt every 10 minutes or so, with long scenes and extended shots that do nothing to advance the narrative. Examples include:
  • a lengthy, static shot of an empty cavern, during which absolutely nothing happens as far as we could tell (unless something got lost in the crop from widescreen);
  • an extended soliloquy on one character's affection for his car;
  • the aforementioned dance scenes, which at least have a bit of eye candy going on if you're into that sort of thing (we're meh about it);
  • and a lovely sequence, set in the kitchen, wherein the gang's superstitious maidservant fetches water and makes coffee.
Riveting stuff.



When the movie permits itself to (ahem) move, it occasionally rises to the level of "mildly engaging schlock", but it's a little too dumb and muddled to really come off, and drops promising plot threads with little fanfare: we were expecting a Monster from a Prehistoric Planet angle, or maybe a Night of the Living Dead standoff, but instead we get a nonsensical mix of hunkerin' down and foolin' around.

Plus the characters are interchangeable, the score is sub-Bartókian rambling that frequently crosses the line from homage to plagiarism, and the special effects...aren't.



But of course, that can be part of the charm: "NO EAT I", sayeth the (mildly damaged) Pumpernickel Loaf of Doom. Alas, you can't mindmeld through a fireplace poker, and besides, isn't it time to go gluten-free? Everyone's throwing out their white flour lately.





Speaking of bodies completely drained of blood, we also caught a couple of Tod Browning flicks on TCM, namely: The Mark of the Vampire, a Dracula clone with Béla Lugosi, clever special effects, and a surprise twist that essentially ruins the movie; and The Devil-Doll, a silly tale of pseudoscience and revenge in France, with Lionel Barrymore as Mrs. Doubtfire.

No DVR = no screenshots, but we'd give 'em both a shiny D+, given the modest entertainment -- and copious opportunities for weary groaning -- they provided.

Monday, December 16, 2013

I've just seen a face

A distinctive demeanor, a memorable mien, an unforgettable countenance: however you put it, sometimes the silver screen is graced with a visage that -- be it handsome or homely, ugly or beautiful, familiar or exotic -- stops you in your tracks.

And whatever adjectives may be apropos in this case, the following two films surely feature a face we'll not soon forget. Nor shall we forget the time or place, for the films themselves are quite singular as well, albeit in two very different ways.



The Sadist (1963)

Grade: B+



Nowadays, making a movie about a deranged serial killer is pretty straightforward. Hell, there are multiple TV programs exclusively devoted to the topic, and shows like Criminal Minds bring a steady diet of torture-porn to eager audiences.  Every week they offer a fresh take on man's inhumanity to man, and a new contribution to our extensive vocabulary dedicated to the agonies of -- and violent trespasses upon -- the human body.



But back in 1963, a film about this subject was a very different proposition. Even as the boundaries of the possible in art began to seem very shaky indeed (or downright arbitrary), there was still a prevailing sense that certain things should not be shown -- that some basic sanctum of human decency and dignity should be preserved, at least within the sphere of public life (of which film is a part).



Now, given that Nanking, Auschwitz, Katyn, and Hiroshima were within recent memory, that notion -- we suppose the right word would be "decorum", though that's too limiting -- might seem like an obscene indulgence. And that's not to mention the endless array of pre-modern atrocities any historian with a strong stomach could reel off -- and which, taken collectively, put paid to any idea that there's ever been a time when human beings weren't doing terrible things to each other.



But a real sea change in public discourse hadn't quite happened yet in 1963. The worst televised horrors of the Vietnam War were still a ways off, the communitarian (and socially normative) spirit of the 1950s was still the dominant voice in the United States, feminine hygiene products still resembled medieval chastity devices...in short, many envelopes were just about to be really pushed.



Or as Philip Larkin once wrote,

Sexual intercourse began
In nineteen sixty-three
(which was rather late for me) –
Between the end of the "Chatterley" ban
And The Beatles' first LP.



And that tension -- between what is and what will be, between what can and can't be shown, between a normative present and a rudderless future -- is probably a big part of why The Sadist is so unexpectedly effective. Sure, on paper it's a thinly veiled cash-in on the Charles Starkweather/Caril Ann Fugate murder spree, with Arch Hall Jr. as "Charlie Tibbs" and Marilyn Manning as the pointedly non-underage "Judy Bradshaw".



And it's hard to imagine it cost much to make; the plot allows 90% of the film to be set in the same place, the cast barely numbers half-a-dozen and features no "name" actors, and the budget demands for costumes, special effects, and the like were -- one assumes -- minimal.



But though The Sadist is hardly perfect, it's not the cynical, half-assed exploitation film one might expect; instead, we get an uncommonly tense and well-crafted little film that easily overcomes its few missteps. Central to this achievement is Arch Hall Jr., whose performance is something we don't often see in these films: genuinely and unexpectedly frightening.



Much like the real Starkweather, his Charlie Tibbs is a bizarre combination of boyish preening and damaged Neanderthal coarseness, with dull, hateful eyes glaring out from beneath a beetle brow and carefully coiffed pompadour. Nothing good can come of a face like that, you'd think, and you'd be right. He veers between detached, giggling sociopathy and sudden fits of rage -- the latter usually prompted by his sense that the other characters look down at him or think he's stupid.

And to be fair, he's usually correct. The other characters underestimate his intelligence and pay a price for it, for Tibbs is crafty indeed.


But not too crafty, for The Sadist is mercifully free of a common trope.  Too many serial killers in film and TV are made out to be omniscient, omnipotent geniuses, capable of meticulous, watertight planning and able to foresee every move their prey might make. Not Tibbs; he's dangerously sharp, and his insecurity and paranoia give him a realistic ability to sniff out trickery -- but he still has limitations (both mental and physical, though the latter disappears and reappears at random) and blind spots.


We can't however, say that we much enjoyed watching The Sadist -- the subject matter is too deeply and unremittingly unpleasant for that -- nor do we have any real urge to watch it again. It's the cinematic equivalent of a certain type of short story where, in essence, one thing happens, and the drive towards that thing is the fabric of the story.  And in The Sadist, that one thing is the systematic psychological torture of a group of people.

As such it's a complete success, and has all the elements of a good dramatic arc, but there's no layering, no cinematic polyphony, no secondary narrative: in other words, there's nothing here that would reward repeat viewing. It's a highly effective and straightforward film with a short half-life, and there's nothing wrong with that.

But seen from the present day, The Sadist looks like the harbinger of things to come. And while we admire its unflinching approach to the subject matter, it's one step down a path that's since been well-traveled indeed -- and we're not sure walking that road has been good for us, or anyone.





Eegah (1962)

Objective Grade: D-
Tasty Shaving Cream Bonus: B+

... and then, there's Eegah.


("The name written in blood!")

Primitive love-starved caveman encounters modern culture; a bizarre mixture of hijinks, ho-hum, and holy cow, wtf? ensues.



Many folks on the bad movie circuit will know this one from its treatment on MST3K, or else for keeping company with The Beast of Yucca Flats and From Justin to Kelly on IMDB's Bottom 100. It was P. who organized our back-to-back Arch-a-thon, and K, not knowing what was coming, fully expected that he of the Cro-Magnon face would be the titular cave dweller.

Instead, we're treated to a handsome-ish young Richard Kiel, in the days before he rose to (relative) stardom in the James Bond franchise as the steel-mawed villain Jaws.



What, then, for Hall? In a complete reversal of his role in The Sadist, Arch plays the clean-cut, gee-whiz, wow-zee-wow-wow* teenager Tom Nelson, a gas station attendant with a swell dune buggy and sweet electric guitar -- both of which receive more than their fair share of screen time.

*actual quote



Unfortunately for Hall, the only thing flatter than his generic smart alecky lines is the crooning he foists upon us during the film's musical breaks (complete with phantom back-up singers!) The action (as it were) screeches to a warbly halt as we're treated to songs about "Vickie" ...


("Vickie! Oh-oo-whoa Vickie! / I'm so alooone...")

... and "Valerie" ...


("If I had a thousand paintings / in a marble gallery / every single picture / would be of" ... you know who!)

... but not, conspicuously, about his girlfriend Roxy Miller (Marilyn Manning). Frankly, we don't blame him -- thanks to some very unflattering hairdos, Manning could easily be mistaken for the mother of Judy Bradshaw, the gum-smacking 14 18 year old she goes on to play a year later in The Sadist.



Eegah's not so picky about his ladies though, which leads to one of the more bizarre hostage situations we've yet encountered. There's a master's thesis worth of material in what goes on in that cave among Eegah, Roxy, Roxy's wounded pith-helmeted father, his shaving kit, a bubbling sulfurous cauldron, and the corpses of Eegah's dead relatives. Trying to explain all the nuances here wouldn't do the film any justice -- it's one of those times where you've just gotta experience it for yourself.


(He even shows her his etchings!)

It's notable that our supposed hero, he-of-the-face, is entirely absent from all that wacky cave action. Instead, Arch Hall Jr.'s father could think of nothing better for Tom to do during the middle 1/3 than wander ineffectually around the surrounding desert landscape. (Oh, did we forget to mention that it was Arch Hall Sr. who directed this ... thing ... and played Roxy's dad? Ah, the pungent smell of nepotism!)



Despite this being essentially a vehicle for the younger Hall and his musical career (as it were), Richard Kiel ends up stealing the show with his youthful Schwarzenegger visage, ludicrous false beard, and community theater animal skin costume. However, credit for our favorite moment in the film goes to the random chef who, in the midst of Eegah's rampage, casually offers up a forkful of meat as through the caveman were just one more bored buffet patron.


("Wait, don't tell me...rare, right?")

Despite this and other chunks of meaty goodness, Eegah is still, at its heart, a bad, bad movie. Bad dialogue, bad lighting, and lots of pointless scenes of driving, singing, swimming, hiking, and otherwise not getting back to the real action. Plus, don't forget about the stock footage!


(Hump?)

But unlike The Sadist, which is far and away the better of the two films, this movie is much more amenable to repeat viewing, if only to catch all those little wtf moments that might have gone unnoticed the first time around.  While we've probably had more than our fill of the scrunched up, scowl-faced, punchably pompadoured "hero" and his off-key serenades, we'd be more than eegah to pay a visit to our new favorite gentle giant and his fabulous facial hair.


(Seriously?)