Sunday, December 18, 2016

Süssmayr, Cooke, Cerha, and Serly

Sometimes, when someone dies and their life's work goes unfinished as a result, another person steps up to complete the job. Even if they're not quite as skillful as the original auteur, it's important to them that the job gets done.

In the case of these three films, we have not symphonies, but evil schemes that get interrupted -- only to be continued, some time later, by a newcomer's efforts.

(And if that seems like a weak theme -- well, it was either that or "All three films feature sexual assault, attempted or otherwise", and that theme's kind of a downer.)



The Ghost Walks (1934)

Grade: B


After a streak of joyless flicks, it's a treat to watch an unapologetically goofy romp like The Ghost Walks, which -- its inclusion on this "horror" box set aside -- is really a farce with a dollop of mystery and a couple of "spooky" elements.

That said, Mill Creek's print of The Ghost Walks is no treat -- not in the audio domain, at least, as the extremely muffled sound renders much of the dialogue near-incomprehensible. Even after heavy filtering in VLC, there were many lines we simply couldn't make out at all.


We were all set to tell you to watch this copy at Archive.org instead, which has far better sound -- but unfortunately, it turns out that it's missing over three minutes from a key scene early in the film. The edit is non-obvious, but the cut material still has a significant impact on the coherence of the plot, and without it the basic conceit of The Ghost Walks makes significantly less sense.


As for what that conceit is, well...rather than spoil the film with a detailed plot summary, we'll merely say that The Ghost Walks -- like so many before it and since -- revolves around that well-worn device, a dark and stormy night.

This particular DASN opens with bigshot producer Herman Wood and his milquetoast assistant Homer Erskine (played by Richard Carle and Johnny Arthur, respectively). These two New Yorkers are being chauffeured through the storm by a young playwright (John Miljan) who wants Mr. Wood to hear a reading of his new play. But naturally, something goes wrong with the car...


...and, after some kvetching in the rain, the trio end up at a spooky old mansion occupied by a bizarre cast of characters, whose personal dramas and grievances quickly ensnare the visitors.


That said it's the crotchety old Wood and, especially, his neurotic assistant who steal the show throughout. Whether Homer Erskine is meant to be a gay character per se, or simply an effete and cowardly "cream-puff", his stormy relationship with Wood -- getting fired at one moment, sharing a bed the next -- is the core of the film's comedy.

In another film, Erskine's lack of the requisite manly virtues might make him a target of overt ridicule, but here he escapes without major harm or humiliation, and gets the lion's share of the film's zingers as well, e.g.:

"It's a union clock."
"What do you mean?"
"Well, it strikes any old time."

Or:

"Say, I don't like these underground places."
"Well, you may as well get used to it -- you may spend a lot of time in one."

They don't read well in print, but his delivery makes them work.

However, Wood gets the film's best one-liner when he chokes on a cigar, gets slapped on the back by Erskine, and responds with irritation:

"What's the idea?"
"Why, you were choking terribly!"
(indignantly) "Well, can you do any better?"


Should we read anything beyond the obvious into Erskine's comment -- when offered dinner and a drink by his host -- that he likes "the cocktail part of the program"? Probably not.

But, hard not to raise an eyebrow when another character angrily tells Wood and Erskine that "There's something queer about you both. He winks at you and you wink at me. I don't like it!"

Make time for The Ghost Walks -- but if you can't make out the dialogue, switch to the Archive.org print for the first 17 minutes. Then cut over to Mill Creek from about 15:47 to 19:12, and then go back to Archive.org for the rest.

(Or we think so, at least, since the Mill Creek print runs 64:30 and the Archive.org print clocks in at 63:26. The latter has a longer opening and fewer skips, so that seems to account for the rest of the difference, but we haven't done a scene-for-scene comparison to see what else might be cut from either print.)



The She-Beast (1966) 

Grade: C-


Truth be told, we still don't like Barbara Steele. That said, not only does she have very limited screentime in The She-Beast, but in her brief appearance she's used to her best and bitchiest effect, as a snobby newlywed whose husband Philip is a pompous ass of an Englishman (Ian Ogilvy).

For whatever reason, they've opted to take their honeymoon in, all together now:


Of course, the town where they stop for the night turns out to be under an old curse, thanks to an improperly handled witch-killing two centuries prior.

They're helpfully informed of this by none other than Count Van Helsing (John Karlsen), a déclassé Transylvanian nobleman who descends directly from you-know-who. He's more than happy to join them at dinner and order a bottle of Slivovitz on their tab, while boring a thoroughly uninterested Barbara Steele with his family history.

If you know Steele is only onscreen for about 20-30 minutes at the beginning of the film, and another few at the end, you can probably guess how the rest of this one plays out. But one redeeming feature of The She-Beast is its sense of humor, which it uses to constantly poke fun at the absurdities of life behind the Iron Curtain.

These are epitomized by their corrupt and piggish innkeeper, the aptly named Groper (Mel Welles). Early on, Groper gets the living crap beaten out of him by Philip for a Peeping Tom attempt gone disastrously wrong -- which is kind of a nice change from the usual victimization routine.

The thing is, Philip is just kind of a dick in general, and any satisfaction in seeing him pummel Groper into unconsciousness is diminished by his gratingly arrogant, ungrateful behavior toward Van Helsing. Having the protagonist be less than thoroughly likable is a nice twist, but The She-Beast belabors it enough so that Philip's petulant stupidity soon becomes infuriating.

But those irritations -- and a rather gratuitous attempted rape scene -- are alleviated somewhat by a couple interesting twists in the plot, and by the film's lampoons of Romanian life (right at the start of the Ceaușescu period, no less). These give The She-Beast a much-needed infusion of black comedy...

...even if they're not altogether subtle about it.



Curse of the Headless Horseman  (1972) 

Objective Grade: F
Wavy Gravy Far-Out Grade: C

"It's almost never a good sign when a movie opens with a lengthy voice-over delivering exposition," we wrote recently, and that's no less true of Curse of the Headless Horseman.

Except, maybe, that it's an even worse sign when that VO is saturated in a delay effect that makes the speaker's words nearly incomprehensible. And then, it's paired with an image in which the color process is so clearly misaligned, it's impossible to imagine who could have looked at it and thought, "This is OK, this works, I've done a good job."

For example, feast your eyes on the image above, with bands of red, blue, and yellow appearing in places those colors have no business being, while the bottom of the frame transitions from a weird purple to a colorless gray.

Do you know what the people in that shot are doing? They're eating pizza, that's what.

All told, the first minutes of Curse of the Headless Horseman look as though they were filmed in B&W and then hand-tinted, one primary color at a time, by the lady who so nicely tidied up that fresco of Jesus some years back.

Perhaps it's Mill Creek's fault (hard to see how), but even once things calm down, we get some seriously weird color schemes in this film. In most shots, orange-reds and blues pop out with a brilliant, hyper-real intensity, while other hues are vastly muted by comparison. It's like watching a Tandy Color Computer game come to life.

Or look at the spectrum expressed in this shot. The lead actor is bounded by fields of dark green and purple, while his face looks as orange as an Oompa-Loompa's. What's happening here?

Other sites can give you a play-by-play of the events in Curse of the Headless Horseman; we won't bother. (If you've seen the excellent 1934 film Our Daily Bread, and throw in a couple episodes of Scooby-Doo, you've got the basic idea.) It hovers well past the threshold of incompetence in every way, with no real sense of pacing, thoroughly amateur acting, and a script that makes little sense.

Naturally, all that is also a big part of the film's charm -- though truthfully, despite our indulgent attitude toward it, we often found our attention drooping.

Like The She-Beast, this film has a beast on the loose, a pair of newlyweds as its (ostensible) protagonists...

...and an uncomfortable, extended scene of sexual assault, committed by a man whom another site aptly dubbed "the harmonica rapist", and made worse when he and his victim then become happily coupled: ugh. At least he eventually gets the crap beaten out of him too.

Another common trait with The She-Beast is the incongruous presence of nobility: check out the French "countess" (Ultra Violet) who abruptly shows up mid-film with her Superman lunchbox in tow, only to disappear with little explanation. She's sometimes listed as the star of the film, but Ultra Violet is barely onscreen for five minutes, if that. Billy Curtis's pop-up in Robot Pilot seems inevitable and organic when compared to this celebutante cameo.



Curse of the Headless Horseman is, let's be clear about this, an awful movie. But it's a moderately entertaining form of awful, far more engaging than the likes of Manos: The Hands of Fate, though not as rewarding as (say) Maniac.

If nothing else, its color choices and script decisions are so completely off-the-wall at times that -- despite the distinct lack of foxy in its ladies -- it's worth seeing at least once.



Friday, December 16, 2016

The missing map

Is there any greater heartbreak for completists? They spend top dollar to buy a game advertised as 100% complete, but then discover that -- though they have the holy trifecta of box, manual, and cartridge -- it's also supposed to come with a fourth component: namely, a poster, map, or other "extra".

Well, The Umbrellahead Review have discovered we inadvertently skipped over a film -- which not only mars our chronology, but renders incomplete our previous post's collection of collectors. So, for the completists among our readers, here's the missing map:



The Snow Creature (1954)

Grade: F



Gather ye round, and join us in the tedium of enduring yet another hackneyed, moderately racist tale of a Himalayan expedition, wherein two "civilized" white scientists ride herd over a gaggle of inscrutable Sherpas!
Actually, that conflict supplies the one tiny flicker of interest in The Snow Creature, since the scientists turn out to be total dicks: when one of the Sherpas' wives is abducted, they not only refuse to help, but actually threaten to shoot the Sherpas if they deviate from the expedition's plans.


It's usually not smart to threaten gunplay when you're wildly outnumbered and on someone else's home turf. Sure enough, the tables are soon turned, and the "Sherpas" -- who speak a language that sounds suspiciously like Japanese, hmmm? -- force the scientists to search for the missing woman.

They also shoot the scientists' shortwave radio while they're at it -- thanks to a rifle that enters, Dr. Tran-like, from one side of the frame. Always nice to see those.

All told, it only takes them about half the movie to find the abductor, subdue him, and bring him to justice. Sure, his wife and child are killed in the process, but these things happen.

Oh, and did we mention that the abductor was a yeti?

Yep, that dark shape up there is the Abominable Snowman, starter of avalanches and collector of Nepalese women. But now the collector gets collected, stuck in a phone booth-like contraption that serves as his jail cell, and dragged back to the United States (after a couple pit stops along the way) for further research and profit.

Until we watched The Snow Creature again, we referred to it in conversation as "that movie about import/export tariffs or something". The film takes a bizarre turn at its midpoint, completely ditching the adventure trappings in favor of a set of conversations about the logistics of transporting a yeti, the rules and regulations applicable thereunto, and other procedural matters.

And as anyone who's ever attended a committee meeting knows, they do drag on.

As though answering the dreams of bored academics everywhere, the yeti soon gets loose and wreaks havoc, prompting a massive manhunt that ultimately ends up in the city's sewer system -- à la The Third Man, except this fugitive presumably spells it "Hairy".

Of course, the real template for a film like this -- first half in the land of the exotic Other, second half back home -- is King Kong, and that's clearly what The Snow Creature is trying to pull off.

The problem is that The Snow Creature is very, very bad in almost every conceivable way. It's a dull, stupid piece of trash, poorly directed and scripted, with nothing whatsoever to redeem it.

Worst of all, it completely fails to come through in the monster department, as we never get a really good look at the title creature, and what little we do get is absurd. For whatever reason (is there a story behind this?), whenever they want to cut away to the yeti, the filmmakers reuse the exact same shot of him lurking in the shadows:

If they want to show him advancing, they play the clip forwards. If they want to show him retreating, they play it backwards. If they want to show him standing still, they use a freeze-frame. And this happens something like six or seven times, with predictably risible results.

Anyway, in a nutshell, The Snow Creature stinks. We suppose the cinematography of the Himalayan scenes is decent, but that's about all there is to enjoy here. If you want to watch a yeti movie (apparently this was the first one?), wait 30-odd years for Snowbeast, or just dial up one of the Bugs Bunny cartoons.

We told you to gather round, but truth be told, these cinematic Himalayas are no place to meet.





Sunday, December 11, 2016

CIB

Some people collect action figures, or video games, or unemployment. But the three films we'll discuss below all feature deviant souls who have chosen, instead, to collect...women.



The Peter Hurkos Story (1960)

Grade: D



We couldn't help but be offended by The Peter Hurkos Story, for much the same reason we were mildly irritated by The Night America Trembled. And that, to remind our loyal readers once again, is because it's bullshit.



From all reports Hurkos was a typical "psychic" con artist, using an array of manipulative tricks to prey on people's hopes and fears. So while this film -- really a two-part episode of One Step Beyond, sponsored by Alcoa and edited together (rather badly) into a single 51-minute feature -- is, in terms of pure craftsmanship, a reasonably well-made example of TV entertainment...

...we can't quite will ourselves to believe anything in the narrative, because Hurkos himself trafficked so unrepentantly in lies.

Was he really a member of the Dutch Resistance? Did a fellow Resistance member, believing Hurkos to be a traitor, really try to smother him in his sickbed -- only to stop when Hurkos read his thoughts? Is there any truth at all to the story, or is it just another fiction from a master manipulator and serial liar? And why on earth did Alcoa sponsor such a cavalcade of cynical crap? 


At the end, the real Hurkos even pops up to offer the following proclamation:

"So long as I live, I offer myself for any test, any study, under any conditions that scientists may impose."




The Embalmer [aka Il mostro di Venezia] (1965) 

Grade: D+

The Embalmer's original Italian title translates, shockingly enough, as "the monster of Venice". And just like it says on the box, a depraved killer is roaming the streets (or really scuba-diving the canals) of Venice, drowning young women before adding them to his collection.


How does he ward off the stink and keep them NM+/NIB, or at least NM-? Well, that's where the English-language title comes in, natch.

But formaldehyde fiddlings can't thwart a reporter's houndlike ability to sniff a good story from a mile away -- and naturally our spunky colleague (Luigi Martocci) rapidly outpaces the police in his efforts to crack the case.

The nexus for all this activity is a sketchy hotel that -- conveniently enough -- is hosting a gaggle of schoolgirls and their chaperone (Maureen Brown). That's, uh, some spectacularly ill-timed tourism.

The Embalmer is one of those films that plays better in memory than in actuality. Before rewatching it to write this review, we had some recollection of it as a middling effort, a bit like (say) Phantom of Soho: murky, meandering, but at least competent in the basics.

But truth be told, it's not really very good at all. The biggest problem is the film's presentation of its own plot, which simply falls down at the task of giving us important information in a way we can understand and retain. That's something crucial in a murder-mystery, even in one with pretensions toward being a horror film.


It'd be easy to blame the dubbing for the fact that (for example) we had no idea who the killer was until we went back and reviewed several key scenes in the movie. Oh, we saw his face, but we didn't recognize him at all, or remember him from earlier in the film.

But we'll hazard a guess that the issue is just as present in the Italian original: whatever the language, if a character doesn't get the necessary screen time or have the needed presence, the issue remains the same.


The real blame probably lies with the film's director and editor. Especially on second viewing, The Embalmer is just loaded with padding that masquerades as suspenseful buildup, and characters who serve no structural purpose in the film, however interesting their faces might be...

...or however amusing it might be to see the Italian Elvis pop out of a coffin.

And even now that we understand the killer's identity, the movie's third act is ultimately a dismal affair. Despite a few memorable images and set-pieces, the inevitably violent conclusion offers no real catharsis, but simply a downbeat shrug of indifference.

However we were hardly indifferent to the actress who played Grace (pictured on the left below), who stood out from the dreary surroundings like a sequined suit in a pile of black velvet.


Her screen time is sadly limited and her name remains unknown to us (thanks, IMDb). But we couldn't help but take note of this fetching young woman, who clearly possessed a certain nous ne savons quoi...

...or maybe we savons exactly quoi it was, now that we think about it, and clearly the cinematographer knew it too. Tanto meglio.



The Atomic Brain [aka Monstrosity] (1964) 

Grade: D-


It's almost never a good sign when a movie opens with a lengthy voice-over delivering exposition that ought to be shown, not told -- and that's just one of several ways in which The Atomic Brain is a sub-mediocre mess. In offering up the tale of a rich old woman (Marjorie Eaton) who teams up with a mad scientist (Frank Gerstle) in pursuit of renewed youth, The Atomic Brain succeeds only in being tacky and half-assed without mustering any real charm.

It's not as if it's a secret why old Mrs. March has placed an ad for a new servant-girl (applications must include your bust, waist, and hip measurements!). Nor is it a surprise what sort of treatment -- in either sense of the word -- the three naïve young women who answer the ad are soon to be in for.

But The Atomic Brain plods forward, undaunted, trailing that half-baked collection of vignettes, clichés, and confrontations it hopes to pass off as a plot.


We were particularly amused by Judy Bamber's attempt at an English accent, yielding a strange hybrid of Texas and New Zealand (plus a dash of South Africa). She's apparently the sexpot of the bunch, and when she swings her hips as she walks -- or just bounces on her bed -- her bodily motions are accompanied in the soundtrack by what we can only describe as "sexy xylophone".

Now that's a word-pair (let alone a concept) that, outside of a particularly hard-fought game of Scrabble, really has no right to exist.

Anyway, the body count is high, the body beautiful count is low, and the door for a sequel is left open in a rather hamfisted manner.

But who would really care to watch The Atomic Brain 2, or Monstrositwo for that matter? It's hard enough to imagine an audience for this film which, though not the very bottom of the barrel, still offers no real rewards for even the most tolerant viewer.

(Unless you really like cats. It's got some of that, at least.)