Wednesday, January 18, 2017

No need

We're just about done reviewing the 51 movies that make up the revamped Tales of Terror subset of our Mill Creek 250-pack. And our final entry for Tales of Terror will be a four-film Tod Slaughter extravaganza.

First, however, come these three leftovers -- movies that, to be frank, we originally put off watching as long as possible -- and only one of which gets a proper review:



The Bat (1926)

Grade: B-

Does the world need our take on this fairly well-regarded silent, especially when it so clearly requests NO SPOILERS right from the get-go?



No, it does not. But, need is a funny word, and the movie charmed us just enough to merit a brief treatment (ahem, Mike Barbosa) to point out a few of our favorite things.



In essence, The Bat is a murder-mystery straight from the stage, with a large enough cast of characters that it was often difficult to sort them out. All the better to keep the viewer guessing as to the identity of the titular villain, something we both struggled with even on the second viewing (which, admittedly, was at double speed; we tried going faster at first, but even without dialogue the movie was so action-packed that we had to slow it down!)



The sets are pleasingly spooky, featuring lavishly trimmed, cavernous rooms (with absurdly large doors), and lots of dark corners from which one nefarious character or another skulks, stalks, or shoots at the assembled guests.


Shadow and light are used to striking effect, something that (for once) the quality of the Mill Creek print doesn't completely screw up. And, to our (perhaps disproportionate) delight, there's actual night-for-night filming!


So, in addition to all that, if you're in the mood for no-nonsense knittin' aunts ...


... a brief medical lesson ...


... or (what we can only assume is) the genesis of the Bat-Signal ...


... then by golly gee, The Bat might not be such a dumb choice. (Just be wary if you're in a girls' dormitory, lest a real bat decide to go all werewolf on ya.)



Manos: The Hands of Fate (1966)

Grade: F


Does the world need yet another website offering up its take on this dull, sad, Grade-Z regional production often heralded as the "worst film ever made"?

No, it does not. Maybe we're being obtuse, but we've seen it twice each (once separately, once together), and have no interest in watching it yet again for a review. There's not much pleasure in Manos, and even less in a trashed, miscolored print like this one.

And:



The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920)

Grade: n/a


Does the world need our take on this acclaimed silent masterpiece -- especially when our assessment would be based on a fuzzy, nth-generation dub from Mill Creek?

No, it does not. But it's always validating to see someone else who's living with an acute shortage of right angles.

Tuesday, January 17, 2017

No kill I! Or, hmmm, wait...

And then there's this pair of moving pictures, in which a prominent character fights for life and freedom -- only to change his mind right at the end and opt for self-destruction.

(Is there any introductory phrase less flattering than "And then there's"? It's basically saying "Oh, in addition to those other, more important things I've mentioned earlier, this also exists." It turns everything into a forgotten, middle child, or some tasteless sandwich filling whose absence you don't miss.)

(Sorry, Maude.)



Tales of Frankenstein (1958)

Grade: D

Those rogues at Mill Creek got us again! This "movie" is, in reality, a failed TV pilot: not surprising, given its sub-30-minute running time. Did the producers really think a Frankenstein-themed anthology show could possibly have enough material to sustain a weekly audience?

In a 30-minute drama there's usually only time for one plot event, and Tales of Frankenstein follows that rule to a T. (Hey, the title's initialism is the same as "true or false", or "tacos or fajitas?")

So: woman beseeches Dr. F to save the life of her husband, a sculptor dying of heart failure.

Dr. F appreciates the husband's "good hands" but still demurs. Why? Well, he'd rather wait a few days...

You can pretty much guess the rest -- except that the newly-widowed woman (Helen Westcott) is pleasingly feisty. She doesn't hesitate to buffalo her way through the obstructionism of the villagers to find out the truth, even if that truth amounts to "Careful what you wish for..."

The Doctor gets in trouble but is unrepentant, a noble sacrifice is made, the status quo is restored, and everyone moves on with their lives. Exactly how was this going to be a weekly series? One can only wonder.




Night of the Blood Beast (1958)

Grade: D

Night of the Blood Beast could have been a good one. The basic premise of a bloodborne pathogen that can revive the dead has been done to death, of course -- but in this case our Lazarus is no zombie, but ill-fated astronaut John Corcoran (Michael Emmet). He comes back completely compos mentis but as confused as anyone about the situation.

Seeing their dead associate spontaneously revive is enough to scare the crap out of his colleagues (one of whom is his fiancée). It doesn't help that all their watches have stopped and they can't contact any other stations.

And, as they soon discover, he's got a body full of sea monkeys...

...and a very assertive bodyguard (whom he introduces with the utmost nonchalance).

All this, plus Corcoran's impassioned pleas for peace, love, and understanding, set Night of the Blood Beast up to be about as intriguing as an above-average episode of The Twilight Zone. And that's exactly what it should have been, since the TV show's tighter format would spare us the draggy, talky second act that essentially kills the movie.

To make matters worse, the film chickens out from the interesting implications of its premise (NO KILL I) and, instead, descends into a conclusion of preachy monologues and cocksure violence. No one learns anything beyond "if you encounter something unfamiliar or strange, kill it".

Ah, well. At least we'll always have pareidolia.

Monday, January 16, 2017

Warning! Attention! Achtung!

Before watching the next three films -- all of which, as it happens, revolve around criminal schemes that run afoul of the law -- be warned: each harbors a serious issue that, in the case of one of these films, can damage your television or even your health. (No, we're not kidding.)



Bowery at Midnight (1942)

Grade: C+

To see Béla Lugosi onscreen in a starring role is, alas, to know you've already spotted the villain. But for the first few minutes of Bowery at Midnight, Béla puts up a good front as Karl Wagner, the kindly operator of a soup kitchen/flophouse. Wagner doesn't ask a lot of questions, or try to save anyone's soul...

...because his is already long gone. Wagner leads a double life, you see, as the mastermind behind a series of particularly brutal robberies -- and his associates have a nasty habit of ending up dead.

And that goes double if they get the bright idea of talking smack about him while he watches on his secret TV (which, to our great pleasure, Bowery at Midnight makes no attempt whatsoever to explain).

Did we say Wagner leads a double life? Well, it's really more of a triple life --

-- for, by day, he's Professor Brenner, noted criminologist and devoted husband. While his criminal associates know that Wagner has a dark side, no one knows that Brenner is Wagner -- and he means to keep it that way.

Wagner/Brenner makes for a refreshingly evil character, and a part tailor-made for Lugosi. He has no compunction about killing anyone, and we mean anyone, who gets in his way. The movie's body count is impressively high, and as another site notes, it quickly establishes that any character can die at any time -- something that puts us in a completely different headspace, so to speak, from the usual "everything's OK in the end and only the bad guys get it" fare.

Of course there has to be an infusion of spunk somewhere along the line, right? And Bowery is no exception, though it distributes its moxie more or less evenly between Wagner's assistant Judy (Wanda McKay), a nurse who knows nothing of her boss's dark side --

-- and her wealthy boyfriend Richard (John Archer), who -- quelle coincidence! -- is taking Brenner's criminology class. Annoyed and offended by Judy's long nights in the Bowery, Richard decides to scope things out for himself. This is not one of his better ideas.

Bowery suffers from a mild case of One Subplot Too Many, though other writers have overlooked one possible motivation for its bizarrely tacked-on zombie theme. Let's put it this way: if zombification is fully reversible, you can off as many people as you want without violating the Hays code.

Now, a very important warning: at approximately 55:41 into Mill Creek's print of Bowery at Midnight, the viewer is hit out of nowhere with an ear-splittingly loud noise (probably feedback of some kind) in one channel.

It's far louder than the surrounding audio, sounds like a cross between a siren and a Slinky from hell, and is more than capable of blowing out your speaker if you've got the volume turned up (and who doesn't when trying to make out the dialogue on these Mill Creek DVDs?). If you're listening on headphones, it could certainly cause hearing damage.

It also made us jump about 10 feet even though we had a vague idea it was coming (thanks to a warning on another site, and we're grateful for the solid), marking the first genuinely scary moment we've had on this box. And when we watched Bowery again for this review, K. spent the entire time cringing in apprehension.

So how will you know when it's coming, short of watching the counter on your DVD player? Well, watch out for this scene in which Judy is asking one of the flophouse residents to run an errand for her, and hands him some money:

Right after that, she leaves and walks into the next room, and that's when the noise happens. Turn down your volume in advance! You'll know you're clear when she begins to speak with this man, "Doc" Brooks:

If all this sounds overwrought, believe us, it's no joke. Consider yourself warned!



Midnight Shadow (1939)

Grade: F

Another Sack film with an all-black cast, Midnight Shadow poses the question: how do you stretch 25 minutes' worth of film into a 50+ minute featurette?

Why, with "comic relief", of course -- if you can use that term to describe the asinine and joyless antics of the two wannabe detectives who mug their way through this film. We remembered Midnight Shadow as one of the worst films we'd seen on this box, but for the first 15 minutes or so, we found ourselves questioning this assessment: did this silly but inoffensive murder-mystery really deserve that much opprobrium?

But once Buck Woods and Richard Bates show up onscreen, look out. It's not merely that they're unfunny, or that there's something embarrassing and painful about watching them carry on. They're just flat-out obnoxious, so insultingly stupid that it moves us to anger.

And it doesn't help that Richard Bates has a creepy, young-old face that makes his role as "Junior" somehow disturbing -- a bit like John Hurt's early scenes in Heaven's Gate, we suppose, but much, much worse. Ostensibly a young man, he certainly doesn't look much younger (if at all) than his onscreen parents.

So be warned: the presence of these two pretty much tanks any chance for Midnight Shadow to be what it could have been, i.e. a threadbare but mildly entertaining romp whose rough edges and incoherent script are almost forgivable in light of its brevity and circumstances.

Instead, it's just a big steaming pile of anhedonia. Sorry, Sack.




Torture Ship (1939)

Grade: C-


Let's get the warning out of the way upfront this time: Mill Creek's print of Torture Ship is missing the first 9-10 minutes of the film, give or take. And while you can infer the gist of the missing material pretty quickly -- these people are criminals on a boat, this person's a scientist conducting experiments on them, etc. -- it still has a major impact on the film's coherence and enjoyability.

It turns out that neither YouTube nor Archive.org can supply the missing beginning to the film, so we digitally "rented" a copy of Sinister Cinema's version, which seems to be the only place to get those opening minutes. The Sinister print is certainly better than Mill Creek's copy, but much as with The Ghost Walks several entries back, it also has some unexpected flaws. Among these are a scene that's been mysteriously replaced by an exact repetition of a later scene (which is confusing as hell), and a couple skips and audio dropouts that aren't present in the Mill Creek version.

If you choose to watch the Mill Creek version of Torture Ship (from which all of these screenshots are taken), you'll be a bit lost for a while, but you'll still be able to enjoy the film's wealth of interesting faces. And it sure has a lot of them, though there's a clear winner in the bespectacled fellow pictured at the very start of this review, Skelton Knaggs, a man who -- as you can see -- looks exactly like his name.

Our female protagonist, Joan, is played by Julie Bishop -- who, speaking of fah-chays, looks a bit like the young Arlene Francis (a cutie in her youth, if you didn't know that: certainly worth a Google, no need for a Bing).

An innocent secretary unwittingly mixed up in a murderous racket, her only lifeline is heroic Lt. Bob Bennett (the ever-redoubtable Lyle Talbot), nephew to the scientist we mentioned a while back. And boy, does she give him bedroom eyes when he saves her bacon.

And speaking of women of a certain age who work in quartets, the comic relief in Torture Ship is supplied by Ole Olson (Eddie Holden), a stereotyped Swede and spiritual grandfather of Sven Lindström. Cowardly but sweet-natured -- and full of gratuitous transformations of palato-alveolar affricates into palatal approximants, naturally -- he gets the film's best line, or at least its strangest:

"If a gun was even two feet in front of me, it would run like 'Hail, Columbia'."

In its Mill Creek-ified form, Torture Ship is a murky and unsatisfying affair; with the opening restored, it's a marginal but reasonably entertaining hour of plots and counterplots, with a little woo-woo science for added spice, and at least one unforgettable face.

If you're reading this and decide to assemble the best parts of the Mill Creek and Sinister prints into some sort of restoration project, drop us a line with the download link -- we'd love to see your new cut!

Sunday, January 15, 2017

She's still the boss

In many films, the women are pretty while the men are clever. In our next three, it's the opposite: sure, the male leads are hunky and charismatic, but when it comes to cunning leadership, it's the ladies who own the day.



Shock (1946)

Grade: C


On the eve of reuniting with her long-lost husband, a woman (Anabel Shaw) witnesses a psychiatrist (Vincent Price) murder his wife, and is so traumatized that she falls into a catatonic state. And guess who ends up supervising her care?

Though competently made, Shock isn't long on suspense, thrills, or grim noirish atmosphere -- in other words, the things that help make a film like this great. What it does have is Price, genteel and faintly sinister (as always), whose indisputable stage presence and imposing frame help him to easily take command of every scene he's in (as always).

He's well-paired here with Lynn Bari as a scheming nurse who, Lady Macbeth-like, goads him into compounding his sins. She's a fully believable love interest for the brooding psychiatrist, and has enough physical presence of her own to stand up to Price.

Less impressive is Anabel Shaw, whose performance somehow doesn't connect. She reminded us very much of Cathy O'Donnell from The Amazing Mr. X (also starring Lynn Bari!), but while O'Donnell's innate warmth encouraged us to care about her character's travails, Shaw just comes off as overwrought and hapless.



We also might have enjoyed Shock more were it not for the terrible audio quality of Mill Creek's print. Distorted and muffled, it's hard to understand without aggressive EQ, and even after filtering it's still a tough listen.

But we did get a bit of a "shock" ourselves, when this popped up in a montage:

(And yes, no need to Google it if you don't remember -- it was a Tuesday.)



Teenage Zombies (1959)

Grade: D-



Oh, Don Sullivan. We'll always love you for "The Mushroom Song", but your boyish charm isn't enough to elevate Teenage Zombies to respectability. When the film you're in compares unfavorably with freakin' Bloodlust, that's a bad sign.


Fact is, Teenage Zombies is only one or two standard deviations above the likes of Manos: The Hands of Fate. It's not as flagrantly incompetent as Manos, but its hulking manservant -- and long pointless travel shots -- are surely cut from the same cloth.

A few touches, e.g. having a female mad scientist for a change, keep Teenage Zombies from occupying the very bottom of the trash heap. But it lacks the charm of a Giant Gila Monster, without which its dull stretches and atrocious line readings are much harder to forgive -- and boy, is that canned soundtrack overbearing.

But don't worry, Don. Teenage Zombies may have made us sad little mushrooms for a while, but we can still summon laughter -- "ah-wonderful" laughter -- at least where chicken-wire "jail cells" are concerned.



Colossus and the Headhunters (Maciste contro i cacciatori di teste) (1963)

Grade: F



Eh, truth be told, our heart's not much in this famously bad Maciste flick either. The print looks like ass, the production values are half-assed but not endearingly so, and none of the principals command much attention, not even the big guy himself (Kirk Morris).

So what's left? Well, a strong queen, who fights, wears funny hats -- 

-- and naturally falls in love with Maciste, thanks either to his chiseled physique or his ability to walk off serious arrow wounds.

Or maybe it's his uncanny ability to find neatly mowed grasslands through which to lead his party of displaced persons? Who knows.

Anyway, evil brother, imprisoned father, blah blah blah, badly choreographed swordfights, blah blah. Oh, and an interminable dance scene, speaking of bad choreography.

Should we write any more? Let's ask this guy, who's doing Thorgrim-goes-Hawaiian cosplay or something:

Naah, we've done enough. We don't need to log every detail of a movie like this.