Showing posts with label disc 46. Show all posts
Showing posts with label disc 46. Show all posts

Sunday, September 29, 2019

Crashing the Dude Man's Renegades

If you're a loyal Umbrellahead reader, you'll remember that a little while back we encountered a bit of a problem with Disc 46 of our 250-movie Horror Collection. Since this disc of "Western Legends" technically came as part of our beloved box, it seemed only right to give these next four films a proper viewing and an entry on the blog.

But westerns? Though we're grateful to other folks and their blogs for keeping them alive in our collective memories (and, on occasion, our interests do intersect), the oater isn't exactly our schtick. Certainly this was going to be a tedium of tumbleweeds, chiseled chins, drunken brawls, mob justice, and southern California being variously passed off as Texas, Colorado, Wyoming, or some other generic western locale.

Convinced that each movie would be a barely distinguishable carbon copy of the others, K googled "western movie cliches" and prepared a YEE-HAW bingo board (courtesy of buzzword/bullshit bingo) to add at least some measure of spice to the affair:



Ah, the best-laid plans. In went Disc 46, and out galloped:



Crashing Thru (1939)

Grade: C-



Mounties? Yes, Mounties, as in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police: Sergeant Renfrew (James Newill) and Constable Kelly (Warren Hull), cruising through the snow-capped peaks and lushly coniferous landscape of the Yukon.


Ha! It really is Southern California after all - Big Bear Lake, apparently.

So much for those tumbleweeds. But this Northwestern does tick a few of the boxes. There's a gold heist aboard the steamship, which is about as close as we're likely to get to a bank robbery in the Canadian wilderness.



Also, the inevitable unflattering native stereotypes, with characters named "Slant Eye"and "Eskimo Pete" alongside an old, pig-tailed, pipe-smoking First Nations woman, whose casting notice likely emphasized the word hag in boldface.



Not that we were still playing YEE-HAW bingo at that point; when Renfrew the Mountie started crooning his head off in a bid to woo the tricksy Ann 'Angel' Chambers (Jean Carmen), K. realized she'd been thinking John Ford or Clint Eastwood, when she should have channeled Gene Autry and Hopalong Cassidy. These are poverty row westerns, where the intentions are wholesome, the banter witty, and the cowboys (or Mounties) singing.



Anyway, considering it as a Monogram picture, there's nothing much to complain about with Crashing Thru. The plot has your standard elements -- the crime, the chase, the double-cross, the distressed damsel, the final showdown -- and they're dealt with in systematic and straightforward (and sometimes stylish) fashion.



The action is meted out judiciously between the more talky sequences, though the exposition never seems pointless. The piney wilderness setting is certainly a welcome change from the spooky old mansions or mean city streets of other '30s fare.



As heroes, Renfrew and Kelly are a bit of a goof -- the aforementioned crooning (to ladies, and to one another), plus an embarrassing hoodwink involving the boiler room -- but one must admit, there's something that's just inherently funny about Mounties.





The Dude Ranger (1935)

Grade: D+
If Complete: C-



George O'Brien is an assface. Granted, half our Umbrellahead team is of the opinion that Mr. O'Brien is, in fact, just fine in the looks department, but that half is not the half that is writing this review.



If your ideal rugged western protagonist is a slightly paunchy middle manager with a stupid haircut and weird mixture of fey smugness and dull-witted confusion permanently etched on his stupid assface, then The Dude Ranger is ready and waiting.



OK, the paunchy part isn't quite fair -- Georgie was apparently quite the athlete in his day, with some (nearly) nudie photos to prove the point. The haircut and the silly expressions may be holdovers from his silent film days, when that look was the thing.



And true, the point of the film is that George's character Ernest Selby, aka Dude Howard, is an ostensibly inexperienced Easterner come to collect his ranch inheritance, and not a dyed-in-the-denim, whip-thin, leanly muscled, life-long grizzled mountain man.


Y'know, like these other guys around the ranch.

But if we can comment upon all the boot-fa-chays and handsome features of the women we regularly encounter in our watchings, then George O'Brien is going to get his turn in the firing line.



With all that out of the way, the film itself, then -- again, it's poverty row, and a serviceable example. It has the usual tropes -- the comic relief sidekick (Syd Saylor, another singing cowboy), the double-cross, and even a perennial favorite of the period, the pretty girl with a male relative in a wheelchair (Irene Hervey as Anne, and Henry Hall as her dad Sam, respectively).



Unlike Crashing Thru, this one was a bit harder to follow at times, at one point necessitating a rewind so that K, perhaps overly distracted by the abundance of assface, could grasp the finer points of a cattle rustling arrangement. As we later found out, some of the confusion wasn't entirely our fault. As with many other Mill Creek offerings, this version of The Dude Ranger had several scenes cut, ranging from the relatively minor (Anne does some banking) to near-critical (the entire backstory to Anne's dance ruse).



Despite the hacks to the plot and the assface on parade, The Dude Ranger had enough of a story and consequent action to keep things interesting up until nearly the end. The denouement did feel a bit like they ran out of runtime and wanted to wrap things up quickly, but given the scenery on offer during the final chase (for once it's not California!), we're willing to cut a bit of slack.



When a Man's a Man (1935)

Grade: C


Literal assface

If, dear reader(s), you thought the negative reaction to George O'Brien in The Dude Ranger was a tad hyperbolic, then perhaps you'll understand why when you see who stars in the film immediately following:



Yup, here we go again with this assface playing yet another fresh-off-the-locomotive greenhorn -- this time Larry Knight, who's convinced his path to self fulfillment lies in the breaking of a charismatic bucking bronco.


Or wooing -- sometimes it's hard to tell.

After making an ass of his assface at the local ro-DAY-o (as in Drive) and missing his westbound train, Mr. Aw-Shucks bumbles his way to the ailing Cross Triangle Ranch, ingratiating himself with owner Dean Baldwin (Richard Carlyle), his conveniently of-age daughter Kitty (Dorothy Wilson), and inconveniently-in-love-with-said-daughter foreman, Phil Acton (Paul Kelly).



That last qualifier should clue you in to one of the major conflicts of this movie; the other concerns dastardly neighboring rancher Nick Gambert (Harry Woods) and his opportunistic water-hogging ways (score a point for YEE-HAW bingo).



The former of these conflicts is handled in rather gentlemanly fashion, with all parties having evidently graduated (with honors) from the school of No Hard Feelings.



And, without giving too much away, the latter conflict comes to an explosive head, thanks to Knight having also earned an advanced certificate from the Acme Corporation Academy in Suspenseful Deployment of Pyrotechnics.


meep meep

With an assist, naturally, from Chekhov's black stallion.



Despite being tired of looking at that face for two films in a row, we thought this one wasn't half bad. Production values seemed somewhat better than in Crashing Thru or The Dude Ranger, and there was the added benefit of no missing scenes (always a plus). And watching the final plan unfold  -- complete with gun fightin', tunnel crawlin', and a very clever way of escaping blame -- was, ahem, simply a blast.





Rock River Renegades (1942)

Grade: D



What does one say about a movie co-starring three grown-ass men whose real-life silly nicknames are also the names of their characters? A film where John "Dusty" King, Max "Alibi" Terhune, and Umbreallahead un-favorite Ray "As-I-Watched" "Ass-Faced Voyeur" "Always The Ape" Corrigan (modestly going by just "Crash") share top billing with a ventriloquist's dummy named Elmer Sneezeweed?



This was the western we'd been unconsciously bracing for from the outset. Hokier, jokier, and overall oatier, it's just one of two dozen Monogram-produced "Range Busters" films, the majority of which star the exact same trio, doing, we imagine, the exact same western-y things each time, with minor variations.


Y'know, western-y things, like light bondage.

So, what does one say? Not a whole lot.


And frankly, I'm just plain tired of writing about Westerns.

We've got some pretty typical stuff -- a lynch mob on horseback; the furniture-busting barroom brawl; Mr. Bad Guy attempting to pass as a law-abiding citizen (though maybe he should've reconsidered the black hat); and exactly one eligible spunky female in the 18-25 age range.


Alas, still no bingo.

Unfortunately, the ratio of talkiness to action is skewed in the wrong direction, without the benefit of a compelling plot. Yawn. Maybe the other Range Busters have something more exciting to offer, but if this one is a representative example, then we'd be dummies to keep watching.




Monday, August 14, 2017

Where there's a will, there's a plot

That is: for all three of these films, not only is their story heavily shaped by somebody's last will and testament, but a character within the film concocts a scheme -- a plot, if you will (and who cares if you won't) -- that interferes with another character's inheritance.



Green Eyes (1934)

Grade: D

Well, Green Eyes tries, there's no denying that. After suffering through a passel of "old dark house" mysteries that seem to be making things up as they go along, it's nice to see one that steers with a surer hand.

No doubt it helps to base your movie on a novel -- in this case The Murder of Steven Kester, by one H. Ashbrook -- since the author's already put in the proverbial hard yards to ensure everything makes sense, and every Chekhovian gun gets fired.

Still, Green Eyes drags. Its talky tale of a miserly old man murdered at his own costume party may not be as predictable as some, but still failed to really engage us. The performances are largely rote, the direction is workmanlike, and the mystery itself is ultimately the sort where you shrug and say "OK, sure, whatever" rather than feeling like you've witnessed a satisfying resolution of inevitabilities.

And then there's this guy:

In our entry for A Shot in the Dark we noted our amusement at how much Charles Starrett looks like John de Lancie, aka Q on Star Trek: The Next Generation. But we didn't expect that we'd subsequently see him in a role where he acts like Q. Sure, he's billed as "mystery writer Bill Tracy", but what about the funny anachronistic costume -- a Q penchant?

Or his habit of popping up randomly, à la creepy Watson, to offer advice to the real detectives?

Or his insufferably cocksure, almost omniscient demeanor -- as though he were a fly on every wall and already knew everything about the case?

No, friends, what we have here is an early non-canon appearance of Picard's most irritating adversary (and least-wanted ally), doing research in 1934 to better prepare for 2364. One assumes that the other actors knew something was amiss with their costar but -- since crossing de Lancie can easily put you in a pickle -- it's probably best that no one called him out on his time-traveling escapades.




Son of Ingagi (1940)

Grade: D+


Wait, a movie about newlyweds trying to spend their honeymoon at home, before a zany cast of characters barges in to their chagrin? Didn't we just see this one -- twice?

But Son of Ingagi goes in a wholly different direction, and to the film's credit we really weren't sure what was coming until about halfway through. We might have expected the crucial plot twist had we seen Ingagi, a 1930 film that doesn't seem to be available anywhere, though multiple copies survive. Then again, maybe not, since Son appears to be an unauthorized, in-name-only sequel.

(By the way, the scarcity of Ingagi may not be unrelated to the producers' appropriation of someone else's ethnographic footage -- for which they were promptly sued and lost big: oops.)

In any event, this "race film" (as they were once called) is a somewhat threadbare effort, but clearly a notch or two better than, say, The Devil's Daughter, and umpteen notches above the likes of Midnight Shadow. It doesn't compare unfavorably with a lot of what came out of Poverty Row around the same time.

It's also difficult to talk much about Son of Ingagi without spoiling the aforementioned surprise, not that it's anything all that earth-shaking. (But it involves a sandwich, a gong, and a cut finger.)

Among the cast members of Son of Ingagi, let's single two out for special discussion -- both women, as it happens. (Hey, now that we think of it, Son of Ingagi passes the Bechdel test with flying colors.)

First is Laura Bowman as Dr. Helen Jackson, portraying that rarest of cinematic birds: a black female scientist. Who knows if Son of Ingagi was the very first film to have such a character, but surely it has to be among the earliest. Dr. Jackson apparently makes a brilliant discovery in the course of the film; pity the script never bothers to tell us exactly what it is.

Second, we have Daisy Bufford as the bride, Eleanor Lindsay. Her facial muscles must have gotten a workout during this one, as we haven't seen this much smiling since Monster from a Prehistoric Planet. She smiles when things are very good, when things are very bad, and everywhere in between. She even smiles to herself when she's all alone, à la Rose Nylund.

It wouldn't surprise us at all if Son of Ingagi is a far better film than its namesake (using that word in its less-common, contronymic sense). Whatever its shortcomings, at least it's not unpleasant to watch, and the bit with the sandwich was vaguely amusing in a sub-Chaplin-esque way.




The Thirteenth Guest (1932)

Grade: D+



It's hard to look at Ginger Rogers the same way once you've seen her "We're in the Money" opener from The Gold Diggers of 1933, wherein she praises the merits of liquid assets by staring at the camera and unleashing a torrent of Pig Latin. Somewhere between Sinéad and Samwell, I think, is our basic response here -- by which we mean the uncomfortable feeling of having a kind of unwanted, insincere, perverse intimacy thrust upon us, via a performer's insistent gaze. 'Swonderful, to quote another "stare"? No, 'screepy.

Anyway, it took us by surprise when she got killed off about five minutes into The Thirteenth Guest. She may look alive, but it's death by electrocution, you see:

One ought to be clever about such things, though, and while our guess wasn't quite correct, we had the right idea. Like Teller, and maybe Penn, 'tis hard to fool us.

In any event, had we been fated not to see Ginger's face again in what remained of The Thirteenth Guest, we certainly had some other familiar faces to enjoy, like Lyle "Not Two Goldfish" Talbot and the guy who played Smokey in that railroad flick we liked.

As crime solver Phil Winston, Talbot draws from much the same well of arrogance as Charles Starrett's peripatetic mystery writer. But as he's speaking ex cathedra, his pronouncements are backed up by the boys in actual blue -- though, in trying to unravel the webs of intrigue that surround a deeply dysfunctional family, he occasionally demonstrates a decided lack of papal infallibility.

Another face we thought familiar was that of Frances Rich, who plays the breezily amoral Marjorie. We could've sworn she was the nurse in Buried Alive, but nope -- that was Beverly Roberts, whom Rich resembles in appearance and, especially, voice.

In fact Rich's career spanned only six movies before she packed it in and became a sculptor, living to the ripe old age of 97. No word on whether she was responsible for the Lard Lad, but voice aside, she clearly didn't eat his products too often.

The best thing we can say about The Thirteenth Guest may sound like faint praise, but it's actually not: right about the time we thought we were halfway done with the movie, it turned out we were more like two-thirds done with it. So -- though the overall impression is still of a very talky, fairly cheap production -- there are parts that actually move along nicely, and a few stylish shots to boot.

Not that that's enough to overcome The Thirteenth Guest's draggy bits and incoherent plot elements (i.e. why would someone wear a disguise when no one can see them?). But it's always a plus when a film doesn't make us want to off ourselves while we're in the act of watching it.