Showing posts with label wheelchairs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wheelchairs. Show all posts

Sunday, September 29, 2019

Crashing the Dude Man's Renegades

If you're a loyal Umbrellahead reader, you'll remember that a little while back we encountered a bit of a problem with Disc 46 of our 250-movie Horror Collection. Since this disc of "Western Legends" technically came as part of our beloved box, it seemed only right to give these next four films a proper viewing and an entry on the blog.

But westerns? Though we're grateful to other folks and their blogs for keeping them alive in our collective memories (and, on occasion, our interests do intersect), the oater isn't exactly our schtick. Certainly this was going to be a tedium of tumbleweeds, chiseled chins, drunken brawls, mob justice, and southern California being variously passed off as Texas, Colorado, Wyoming, or some other generic western locale.

Convinced that each movie would be a barely distinguishable carbon copy of the others, K googled "western movie cliches" and prepared a YEE-HAW bingo board (courtesy of buzzword/bullshit bingo) to add at least some measure of spice to the affair:



Ah, the best-laid plans. In went Disc 46, and out galloped:



Crashing Thru (1939)

Grade: C-



Mounties? Yes, Mounties, as in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police: Sergeant Renfrew (James Newill) and Constable Kelly (Warren Hull), cruising through the snow-capped peaks and lushly coniferous landscape of the Yukon.


Ha! It really is Southern California after all - Big Bear Lake, apparently.

So much for those tumbleweeds. But this Northwestern does tick a few of the boxes. There's a gold heist aboard the steamship, which is about as close as we're likely to get to a bank robbery in the Canadian wilderness.



Also, the inevitable unflattering native stereotypes, with characters named "Slant Eye"and "Eskimo Pete" alongside an old, pig-tailed, pipe-smoking First Nations woman, whose casting notice likely emphasized the word hag in boldface.



Not that we were still playing YEE-HAW bingo at that point; when Renfrew the Mountie started crooning his head off in a bid to woo the tricksy Ann 'Angel' Chambers (Jean Carmen), K. realized she'd been thinking John Ford or Clint Eastwood, when she should have channeled Gene Autry and Hopalong Cassidy. These are poverty row westerns, where the intentions are wholesome, the banter witty, and the cowboys (or Mounties) singing.



Anyway, considering it as a Monogram picture, there's nothing much to complain about with Crashing Thru. The plot has your standard elements -- the crime, the chase, the double-cross, the distressed damsel, the final showdown -- and they're dealt with in systematic and straightforward (and sometimes stylish) fashion.



The action is meted out judiciously between the more talky sequences, though the exposition never seems pointless. The piney wilderness setting is certainly a welcome change from the spooky old mansions or mean city streets of other '30s fare.



As heroes, Renfrew and Kelly are a bit of a goof -- the aforementioned crooning (to ladies, and to one another), plus an embarrassing hoodwink involving the boiler room -- but one must admit, there's something that's just inherently funny about Mounties.





The Dude Ranger (1935)

Grade: D+
If Complete: C-



George O'Brien is an assface. Granted, half our Umbrellahead team is of the opinion that Mr. O'Brien is, in fact, just fine in the looks department, but that half is not the half that is writing this review.



If your ideal rugged western protagonist is a slightly paunchy middle manager with a stupid haircut and weird mixture of fey smugness and dull-witted confusion permanently etched on his stupid assface, then The Dude Ranger is ready and waiting.



OK, the paunchy part isn't quite fair -- Georgie was apparently quite the athlete in his day, with some (nearly) nudie photos to prove the point. The haircut and the silly expressions may be holdovers from his silent film days, when that look was the thing.



And true, the point of the film is that George's character Ernest Selby, aka Dude Howard, is an ostensibly inexperienced Easterner come to collect his ranch inheritance, and not a dyed-in-the-denim, whip-thin, leanly muscled, life-long grizzled mountain man.


Y'know, like these other guys around the ranch.

But if we can comment upon all the boot-fa-chays and handsome features of the women we regularly encounter in our watchings, then George O'Brien is going to get his turn in the firing line.



With all that out of the way, the film itself, then -- again, it's poverty row, and a serviceable example. It has the usual tropes -- the comic relief sidekick (Syd Saylor, another singing cowboy), the double-cross, and even a perennial favorite of the period, the pretty girl with a male relative in a wheelchair (Irene Hervey as Anne, and Henry Hall as her dad Sam, respectively).



Unlike Crashing Thru, this one was a bit harder to follow at times, at one point necessitating a rewind so that K, perhaps overly distracted by the abundance of assface, could grasp the finer points of a cattle rustling arrangement. As we later found out, some of the confusion wasn't entirely our fault. As with many other Mill Creek offerings, this version of The Dude Ranger had several scenes cut, ranging from the relatively minor (Anne does some banking) to near-critical (the entire backstory to Anne's dance ruse).



Despite the hacks to the plot and the assface on parade, The Dude Ranger had enough of a story and consequent action to keep things interesting up until nearly the end. The denouement did feel a bit like they ran out of runtime and wanted to wrap things up quickly, but given the scenery on offer during the final chase (for once it's not California!), we're willing to cut a bit of slack.



When a Man's a Man (1935)

Grade: C


Literal assface

If, dear reader(s), you thought the negative reaction to George O'Brien in The Dude Ranger was a tad hyperbolic, then perhaps you'll understand why when you see who stars in the film immediately following:



Yup, here we go again with this assface playing yet another fresh-off-the-locomotive greenhorn -- this time Larry Knight, who's convinced his path to self fulfillment lies in the breaking of a charismatic bucking bronco.


Or wooing -- sometimes it's hard to tell.

After making an ass of his assface at the local ro-DAY-o (as in Drive) and missing his westbound train, Mr. Aw-Shucks bumbles his way to the ailing Cross Triangle Ranch, ingratiating himself with owner Dean Baldwin (Richard Carlyle), his conveniently of-age daughter Kitty (Dorothy Wilson), and inconveniently-in-love-with-said-daughter foreman, Phil Acton (Paul Kelly).



That last qualifier should clue you in to one of the major conflicts of this movie; the other concerns dastardly neighboring rancher Nick Gambert (Harry Woods) and his opportunistic water-hogging ways (score a point for YEE-HAW bingo).



The former of these conflicts is handled in rather gentlemanly fashion, with all parties having evidently graduated (with honors) from the school of No Hard Feelings.



And, without giving too much away, the latter conflict comes to an explosive head, thanks to Knight having also earned an advanced certificate from the Acme Corporation Academy in Suspenseful Deployment of Pyrotechnics.


meep meep

With an assist, naturally, from Chekhov's black stallion.



Despite being tired of looking at that face for two films in a row, we thought this one wasn't half bad. Production values seemed somewhat better than in Crashing Thru or The Dude Ranger, and there was the added benefit of no missing scenes (always a plus). And watching the final plan unfold  -- complete with gun fightin', tunnel crawlin', and a very clever way of escaping blame -- was, ahem, simply a blast.





Rock River Renegades (1942)

Grade: D



What does one say about a movie co-starring three grown-ass men whose real-life silly nicknames are also the names of their characters? A film where John "Dusty" King, Max "Alibi" Terhune, and Umbreallahead un-favorite Ray "As-I-Watched" "Ass-Faced Voyeur" "Always The Ape" Corrigan (modestly going by just "Crash") share top billing with a ventriloquist's dummy named Elmer Sneezeweed?



This was the western we'd been unconsciously bracing for from the outset. Hokier, jokier, and overall oatier, it's just one of two dozen Monogram-produced "Range Busters" films, the majority of which star the exact same trio, doing, we imagine, the exact same western-y things each time, with minor variations.


Y'know, western-y things, like light bondage.

So, what does one say? Not a whole lot.


And frankly, I'm just plain tired of writing about Westerns.

We've got some pretty typical stuff -- a lynch mob on horseback; the furniture-busting barroom brawl; Mr. Bad Guy attempting to pass as a law-abiding citizen (though maybe he should've reconsidered the black hat); and exactly one eligible spunky female in the 18-25 age range.


Alas, still no bingo.

Unfortunately, the ratio of talkiness to action is skewed in the wrong direction, without the benefit of a compelling plot. Yawn. Maybe the other Range Busters have something more exciting to offer, but if this one is a representative example, then we'd be dummies to keep watching.




Sunday, October 15, 2017

Paging Dr. Cuddy

No bonus points for guessing the theme: someone at Mill Creek no doubt felt very clever when they noted all three of these films' titles have Hugh Laurie in a genitive construction, and so grouped them together on a single DVD side (Disc 48, Side B, if you're keeping count).

That DVD side also represents a milestone, since it marks the end of Night Screams -- or at least the Horror Collection 250-pack's incorporation thereof -- which means we only have one subset left to review, 50 Sci-Fi Classics.

(Of course, a good 25% of those "sci-fi classics" are actually peplum, but we'll cross that bridge...)

Anyway, on to the Houses!



House of Danger (1934)

Grade: C+


In a nutshell, House of Danger is basically House Dark the at Crimes -- that is, Crimes at the Dark House in reverse.

Instead of an evil-minded, mustachioed impersonator seeking to usurp the place of a man he murdered while working thousands of miles from home, we have a benevolent, mustachioed impersonator (Onslow Stevens) desperately trying to avoid usurping the place of the man whose life he saved (James Bush).

And it's not as if House of Danger is coy about any of this; as another reviewer points out, this is a crime story, not a mystery story. But House of Danger is also a romance, as -- unlike The False Sir Percival Glyde -- the false Ralph Nelson most certainly inspires the passion of Sylvia (Janet Chandler), the woman who's been waiting for "him" ever since they made a half-serious promise of engagement a decade ago.

Now, this requires some serious suspension of disbelief, since Onslow Stevens and James Bush don't resemble one another to any meaningful degree. Here's Stevens:

And here's Bush:

So it's hard enough to believe that Sylvia is fooled, let alone all of Nelson's family and friends. But to the film's credit, one person immediately smells a rat:

As Mr. Weatherby, Nelson's uncle (by marriage) and attorney, Howard Lang is one of the film's jewels. Clever and droll, he reminds us a tiny bit of the intrepid Captain McVeigh from City of Missing Girls, though Lang never has occasion to be as spry as H.B. Warner. But he gets off a few good one-liners of the I-guess-you-had-to-be-there variety, as when the two leading men inevitably bicker over Sylvia and he intervenes:

"Well, why not let the girl decide what she wants to do? She will anyway! Bet you hadn't thought of that."

When paired with a chagrined look on both men's faces and a perfectly timed fade to black, it got a big chuckle from us. (Shades of Vernon, Florida too.)

The crime in House of Danger is offscreen, and is also the engine that sets the plot in motion: Nelson's father recently fell off a cliff, and Mr. Weatherby thinks it was murder. Again, it's not as if there's any doubt about who did it; the question is just how to prove it.

There's a certain amount of cleverness in how this unfolds, but the ensuing narrative isn't exactly taut with suspense -- and the ultimate resolution turns out to be something of a deus ex machina.

You may have detected a whiff of stock footage in a couple of these screenshots, and that's one of House of Danger's flaws, though a very minor one. More jarring is the set-piece in which Sylvia serenades a gathering, with strange, dubbed contralto vocals and obviously-pantomimed piano playing that make the sequence teeter dangerously into the realm of the ridiculous. Perhaps we ought to praise the scene for its modest realism, but since Ms. Chandler is already treading in DT territory as it is, it's too big a risk.

Still, House of Danger is -- by our steadily-lowering standards -- a likable little film that neither insults our intelligence nor wastes our time. Tightly plotted and thoughtfully directed, it's two minutes longer than the next movie in this post, yet seemed to go by twice as fast. It's just a pity the image is so dark and unstable, leaving some scenes almost unintelligible, while others teeter on the edge.




House of Mystery (1934)

Grade: F


Graze through reviews of House of Mystery and you'll find the usual stock lines: "Fans of the old dark house genre will certainly enjoy this one" says one reviewer, while another dubs it a "definite recommendation for all Poverty Row fans", and a third opines that "the screenplay is rather good". We just need someone to call it a "fun romp" and it'd make for a complete set of received opinions.


All this reminds us of our observation a few entries back -- that many people watching 1930s movies don't actually seem to see the actual movie in front of them, but instead the signifier that it represents: old-dark-house-ness, or old-timey-ness, or (less charitably) when-men-were-men-and-minorities-were-servants-ness. Whatever it is.

You see, House of Mystery is utter garbage -- a loveless, mirthless exercise in the laziest sort of filmmaking. It's cynical enough to pull the worst kind of bait-and-switch, opening with a pair of scenes in an Indian dive bar and temple that lead us to believe we're in for a "Hindoo" adventure. And to be fair, these sequences, whatever their flaws, are not unatmospheric.


But the script endeavors to lie, to tease the viewer. (See what I didn't not do there?)

For, after the first 10 minutes, House of Mystery reveals itself to be the worst sort of old dark house movie -- with thick servings of talky exposition, thoroughly unlikable characters devoid of humanity, pointless hints at backstory that never get fulfilled, and "comic" relief that leaves us staring at the screen in shell-shocked dismay, wondering how something so joyless and empty ever got made.

Oh, and it's got gorillas.

The most aggravating thing about House of Mystery is probably its tone-deaf stupidity, particularly when it comes to other cultures. Look, we're hardly the sort of people to be quick on the trigger with Tumblr denunciations, but would it have killed them to find out the name of the Hindu goddess of death isn't pronounced "Kay-lie" -- as though Elmer Fudd, having just completed his speech therapy class, decided to buy some lube and overcorrected?

Worst of all is the séance scene that repeatedly invokes the spirit of...Pocahontas. No, we're not kidding! Strangely the offensive absurdity and over-the-top stupidity of this seems to have escaped almost everyone who's written about House of Mystery, with the only exception being the one reviewer who writes:

"Pocahontas? The Native American princess? Well, apparently one type of “Indian” is the same as the other back in the 1930s."

(Unfortunately that reviewer's credibility is a bit shot by his next sentence -- "Yet, silly as it sounds, the picture is complex and suspenseful". Err....)

And wait, holy shit, is that the exact same crystal ball from the screenshot we linked earlier? Too funny.

Anyway, you'd really have to stretch to find something to enjoy in House of Mystery. We suppose the cinematography isn't too bad, with a couple nice shots here and there; shame this print looks so much better than House of Danger, though a few early sections are ripped to shreds with little cuts.

And as the ill-used dancer/servant Chanda, Joyzelle Joyner does what she can with a thankless part. If her heaving shoulders and flashing eyes are more indicative of "acting" than acting, well...at least she's trying.

Otherwise, though -- wait, did we mention it's got gorillas? Two gorillas, for reals.




The House of Secrets (1936)

Grade: C


When it comes to this Anglo-American tale of conspiracy and hidden treasure, full enjoyment probably depends on one's ability to tolerate that creakiest of plot devices, the remarkable coincidence.

Two big coincidences feature in The House of Secrets, and it's quite upfront about the first. When toothy traveler Barry Wilding (Leslie Fenton) rescues a beautiful woman (Muriel Evans) from an awkward situation on a boat, she's appreciative but pointedly refuses to give her name before she departs, leaving him lovelorn and at a loss.

So isn't it remarkable --

-- that she turns out to be Julie Kenmore, a tenant in the spooky old English house he's just inherited? What a curious incident!


But this appears to have been standard practice for the author of the source material, Sydney Horler, who's unfamiliar to us but from all reports was a "nasty little man", racist and anti-Semitic and generally unpleasant.

(By the way, that link claims that Wilding rescued Kenmore from a "masher", but that's not quite true -- close attention to the dialogue reveals the man's interest had something to do with drugs.)

The House of Secrets uses another trope we recently encountered in The Midnight Warning -- namely, the close friend of the protagonist who also happens to be ace detective Tom Starr (Sidney Blackmer).

This kind of thing can be disastrous for a story -- the equivalent of dropping a Level 10 ranger into your entry-level D&D campaign -- but to its credit, The House of Secrets mostly keeps Starr out of the action, leaving Wilding to unpack things on his own.

It's hard to say much more about The House of Secrets without spoiling it, though quite frankly the basic outlines of the plot are pretty obvious before long: with early references to drugs, the sound of maniacal laughter, and portentous warnings from every corner about how Wilding can't possibly be allowed to know what's going on in the house he just inherited and really ought to sell it posthaste? Not too hard to put the basics together.

For most of its 70-minute running time, The House of Secrets is remarkably brisk -- so much so that at some point we looked at each other and were astonished by just how much had happened over the course of the movie: the film felt long in a good way, i.e. from its own cohesion and propulsion. OK, perhaps it has one too many IWGIHs, but the margin of excess is slim.

However, by the 45-50 minute mark, our destination had become obvious enough that other characters' endless evasions and deferrals started to get irritating: yes, we know all will be made clear in the final scene, but maybe it's better to put some pieces in place first, so it's more satisfying when those last few are snapped in.

We also can't claim the ultimate conclusion really grabbed us. Once again, we could tell a Midnight Warning-style denouement was more or less inevitable -- was there a vogue at one time for "So now you see, we had our reasons" plots? -- but everything's a bit too pat, with one-time adversaries turned newfound friends with no time to catch our breath. Can you really make fast friends with someone who recently held you at gunpoint?

Well, The Phantom thought so, and I guess The House of Secrets does too: must have been a 1930s thing.


Anyway, The House of Secrets is a fine way to wind up the Night Screams set -- not least because it actually has some night-time screaming, which is always nice. (It also has a fuzzy, VHS-dubbed print that makes some of the darker scenes more or less inscrutable in their details, but such is Mill Creek life.)

By the standards of this box, it's an above-average suspense tale that kept us more or less engaged throughout its running time -- even if our laughs at the end owed more to resigned incredulity than to real satisfaction.



And to our pleasure and astonishment, that brings us to the end of Night Screams. 12 months ago it seemed inconceivable that we'd ever work through our backlog, whereas now we're spoiled for choice:

Do we immediately continue on to 50 Sci-Fi Classics? (From which we've already reviewed 5-6 movies anyway, mind.)

Or take a detour into one of our other, shorter box sets, like Grit 'n' Perseverance from whence our beloved Beartooh [sic] hailed?

Or wrap up some unfinished business from the Nightmare Worlds subset that begins the 250-pack, and with which this whole project started out -- in more ways than one?

Dunno. But first we have an awards ceremony to convene!