Monday, December 16, 2013

I've just seen a face

A distinctive demeanor, a memorable mien, an unforgettable countenance: however you put it, sometimes the silver screen is graced with a visage that -- be it handsome or homely, ugly or beautiful, familiar or exotic -- stops you in your tracks.

And whatever adjectives may be apropos in this case, the following two films surely feature a face we'll not soon forget. Nor shall we forget the time or place, for the films themselves are quite singular as well, albeit in two very different ways.



The Sadist (1963)

Grade: B+



Nowadays, making a movie about a deranged serial killer is pretty straightforward. Hell, there are multiple TV programs exclusively devoted to the topic, and shows like Criminal Minds bring a steady diet of torture-porn to eager audiences.  Every week they offer a fresh take on man's inhumanity to man, and a new contribution to our extensive vocabulary dedicated to the agonies of -- and violent trespasses upon -- the human body.



But back in 1963, a film about this subject was a very different proposition. Even as the boundaries of the possible in art began to seem very shaky indeed (or downright arbitrary), there was still a prevailing sense that certain things should not be shown -- that some basic sanctum of human decency and dignity should be preserved, at least within the sphere of public life (of which film is a part).



Now, given that Nanking, Auschwitz, Katyn, and Hiroshima were within recent memory, that notion -- we suppose the right word would be "decorum", though that's too limiting -- might seem like an obscene indulgence. And that's not to mention the endless array of pre-modern atrocities any historian with a strong stomach could reel off -- and which, taken collectively, put paid to any idea that there's ever been a time when human beings weren't doing terrible things to each other.



But a real sea change in public discourse hadn't quite happened yet in 1963. The worst televised horrors of the Vietnam War were still a ways off, the communitarian (and socially normative) spirit of the 1950s was still the dominant voice in the United States, feminine hygiene products still resembled medieval chastity devices...in short, many envelopes were just about to be really pushed.



Or as Philip Larkin once wrote,

Sexual intercourse began
In nineteen sixty-three
(which was rather late for me) –
Between the end of the "Chatterley" ban
And The Beatles' first LP.



And that tension -- between what is and what will be, between what can and can't be shown, between a normative present and a rudderless future -- is probably a big part of why The Sadist is so unexpectedly effective. Sure, on paper it's a thinly veiled cash-in on the Charles Starkweather/Caril Ann Fugate murder spree, with Arch Hall Jr. as "Charlie Tibbs" and Marilyn Manning as the pointedly non-underage "Judy Bradshaw".



And it's hard to imagine it cost much to make; the plot allows 90% of the film to be set in the same place, the cast barely numbers half-a-dozen and features no "name" actors, and the budget demands for costumes, special effects, and the like were -- one assumes -- minimal.



But though The Sadist is hardly perfect, it's not the cynical, half-assed exploitation film one might expect; instead, we get an uncommonly tense and well-crafted little film that easily overcomes its few missteps. Central to this achievement is Arch Hall Jr., whose performance is something we don't often see in these films: genuinely and unexpectedly frightening.



Much like the real Starkweather, his Charlie Tibbs is a bizarre combination of boyish preening and damaged Neanderthal coarseness, with dull, hateful eyes glaring out from beneath a beetle brow and carefully coiffed pompadour. Nothing good can come of a face like that, you'd think, and you'd be right. He veers between detached, giggling sociopathy and sudden fits of rage -- the latter usually prompted by his sense that the other characters look down at him or think he's stupid.

And to be fair, he's usually correct. The other characters underestimate his intelligence and pay a price for it, for Tibbs is crafty indeed.


But not too crafty, for The Sadist is mercifully free of a common trope.  Too many serial killers in film and TV are made out to be omniscient, omnipotent geniuses, capable of meticulous, watertight planning and able to foresee every move their prey might make. Not Tibbs; he's dangerously sharp, and his insecurity and paranoia give him a realistic ability to sniff out trickery -- but he still has limitations (both mental and physical, though the latter disappears and reappears at random) and blind spots.


We can't however, say that we much enjoyed watching The Sadist -- the subject matter is too deeply and unremittingly unpleasant for that -- nor do we have any real urge to watch it again. It's the cinematic equivalent of a certain type of short story where, in essence, one thing happens, and the drive towards that thing is the fabric of the story.  And in The Sadist, that one thing is the systematic psychological torture of a group of people.

As such it's a complete success, and has all the elements of a good dramatic arc, but there's no layering, no cinematic polyphony, no secondary narrative: in other words, there's nothing here that would reward repeat viewing. It's a highly effective and straightforward film with a short half-life, and there's nothing wrong with that.

But seen from the present day, The Sadist looks like the harbinger of things to come. And while we admire its unflinching approach to the subject matter, it's one step down a path that's since been well-traveled indeed -- and we're not sure walking that road has been good for us, or anyone.





Eegah (1962)

Objective Grade: D-
Tasty Shaving Cream Bonus: B+

... and then, there's Eegah.


("The name written in blood!")

Primitive love-starved caveman encounters modern culture; a bizarre mixture of hijinks, ho-hum, and holy cow, wtf? ensues.



Many folks on the bad movie circuit will know this one from its treatment on MST3K, or else for keeping company with The Beast of Yucca Flats and From Justin to Kelly on IMDB's Bottom 100. It was P. who organized our back-to-back Arch-a-thon, and K, not knowing what was coming, fully expected that he of the Cro-Magnon face would be the titular cave dweller.

Instead, we're treated to a handsome-ish young Richard Kiel, in the days before he rose to (relative) stardom in the James Bond franchise as the steel-mawed villain Jaws.



What, then, for Hall? In a complete reversal of his role in The Sadist, Arch plays the clean-cut, gee-whiz, wow-zee-wow-wow* teenager Tom Nelson, a gas station attendant with a swell dune buggy and sweet electric guitar -- both of which receive more than their fair share of screen time.

*actual quote



Unfortunately for Hall, the only thing flatter than his generic smart alecky lines is the crooning he foists upon us during the film's musical breaks (complete with phantom back-up singers!) The action (as it were) screeches to a warbly halt as we're treated to songs about "Vickie" ...


("Vickie! Oh-oo-whoa Vickie! / I'm so alooone...")

... and "Valerie" ...


("If I had a thousand paintings / in a marble gallery / every single picture / would be of" ... you know who!)

... but not, conspicuously, about his girlfriend Roxy Miller (Marilyn Manning). Frankly, we don't blame him -- thanks to some very unflattering hairdos, Manning could easily be mistaken for the mother of Judy Bradshaw, the gum-smacking 14 18 year old she goes on to play a year later in The Sadist.



Eegah's not so picky about his ladies though, which leads to one of the more bizarre hostage situations we've yet encountered. There's a master's thesis worth of material in what goes on in that cave among Eegah, Roxy, Roxy's wounded pith-helmeted father, his shaving kit, a bubbling sulfurous cauldron, and the corpses of Eegah's dead relatives. Trying to explain all the nuances here wouldn't do the film any justice -- it's one of those times where you've just gotta experience it for yourself.


(He even shows her his etchings!)

It's notable that our supposed hero, he-of-the-face, is entirely absent from all that wacky cave action. Instead, Arch Hall Jr.'s father could think of nothing better for Tom to do during the middle 1/3 than wander ineffectually around the surrounding desert landscape. (Oh, did we forget to mention that it was Arch Hall Sr. who directed this ... thing ... and played Roxy's dad? Ah, the pungent smell of nepotism!)



Despite this being essentially a vehicle for the younger Hall and his musical career (as it were), Richard Kiel ends up stealing the show with his youthful Schwarzenegger visage, ludicrous false beard, and community theater animal skin costume. However, credit for our favorite moment in the film goes to the random chef who, in the midst of Eegah's rampage, casually offers up a forkful of meat as through the caveman were just one more bored buffet patron.


("Wait, don't tell me...rare, right?")

Despite this and other chunks of meaty goodness, Eegah is still, at its heart, a bad, bad movie. Bad dialogue, bad lighting, and lots of pointless scenes of driving, singing, swimming, hiking, and otherwise not getting back to the real action. Plus, don't forget about the stock footage!


(Hump?)

But unlike The Sadist, which is far and away the better of the two films, this movie is much more amenable to repeat viewing, if only to catch all those little wtf moments that might have gone unnoticed the first time around.  While we've probably had more than our fill of the scrunched up, scowl-faced, punchably pompadoured "hero" and his off-key serenades, we'd be more than eegah to pay a visit to our new favorite gentle giant and his fabulous facial hair.


(Seriously?)

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Four faux fiends

Under the bed, in the bed, on the table, or in the sea: these are places monsters can be. And if you're a good parent, you'll warn your kids of all these possibilities and more.

But if you're looking to raise terrified children, don't turn to these four films, which uniformly disappoint in their attempts at fiendish offerings.



The Head (1959)

Grade: D+



"No, that's German for The Brain That Wouldn't The."

And indeed it is -- though here the brilliant scientist gets the John-the-Baptist treatment, and is kept alive against his will by his newly hired and alarmingly Aryan associate, Dr. Ood (Horst Frank). Meanwhile, a crippled young woman gets a brand-new and sexy-sexy chassis, much to her (eventual) horror, though it's a triumph for the unscrupulous Dr. Ood.



A stylish beginning gave us high hopes for this Teutonic tale of transplantation and torment, but it quickly fizzled out, leaving us with yet another humdrum saga of world-weary dancers, shaky science, crappy image quality, and Götteryämmerung.

Faux fiend the first:



From the beginning, The Head drops hints that Dr. Ood has some sort of...affliction...involving the full moon. As his behavior grew viler and more erratic, we rather expected a big reveal with lycanthropy, baying at the moon, and so on.



Instead, just another sociopath. Perhaps he should've just gotten the MBA instead?
 



Crypt of the Living Dead (1973)
(aka Hannah, Queen of the Vampires)

Grade: C



I've got news for you, kid: in 1973, the bad guys were the ones without mustaches. If you can understand this, many doors of perception will open for you.



Indeed, this moody vampire flick set on a Turkish island has many a mustache to offer, and it's there that you should seek your satisfaction, since the ladies don't have much. The titular vampire looks good while on her back, becomes less compelling once up and out of bed...



...and if that invites a smug remark about how a dude obviously wrote it, well, then there's Lois Gibson. And B.D. Wong.



Plus there's a Barbara Steele lookalike, but who cares?



Unfortunately, mustaches can't do much to repair the terrible sound on Mill Creek's print, nor can it restore the color that's mysteriously gone missing (sorry, Dad).



Faux fiend #2:

Well, at least she's actually a vampire (paging Peter Loew on Isle Üç), but Hannah herself was really kind of lame. She's either supine or lupine, and never does much of anything. Plus there's some guy that lurks around à la Torgo and doesn't do much.

Which leaves the mustaches, or lack thereof. Take heed, friends:





The Devil Monster (1946)

Objective Grade: F
Manta 'n' Mammary Modifier: C+



Oh Christ, this thing. Sorry, but we have to go into pottymouth mode for this one: people who blather about the "worst movie ever" don't know what the fuck they're talking about, because they haven't seen The Devil Monster yet.



Not that this is the worst movie ever -- it's far too amusing for that. And like chronic Lyme disease, the movie's incompetence mostly festers in its joints, especially where the main source material, The Sea Fiend (1936), is haphazardly spliced together with documentary footage taken from God-knows-where.



Highlights of that footage include seals, sharks, bare-breasted ladies of several different ethnicities, and an octopus and a moray eel having an epic battle in the bottom of a "lagoon" that's bounded by a strange, almost aquarium-like pane of glass.



Anyway, tropical island, Béla Lugosi accent, blah blah blah. Other people have written about this shit, we don't need to.

Faux fiend the fird:

The titular monster is a manta ray, for fuck's sake. It's a filter feeder! They don't hurt anyone! Hell, even Captain Caswell doesn't fight them! What's wrong with you people?

Well, nothing a little Grade-Z special effects won't fix, it seems:





A Walking Nightmare (1942)
(aka The Living Ghost)

Grade: C+



Wacky horror-mystery-comedy wherein Nick Trayne (James Dunn), a brilliant PI who got "fed up with the detective business" and became a huckster, is coaxed out of retirement by spunky Billie Hilton (Joan Woodbury) to solve the case of a missing millionaire. So it's off to the millionaire's mansion to meet a colorful cast of characters, and naturally, banter and bickering ensue.



Soon the millionaire turns up, alive but zombified. Cue more banter, some medical mumbo-jumbo, a murder, a spooky abandoned house, and a pro forma romantic subplot.



The (alternate) title notwithstanding, the only real specter in this film is the horrendous ghosting in the spooky-house scenes, which makes everything look like an acid flashback done 1930s style.

Still, it's all inoffensive and moves along relatively quickly. That, plus one or two good one-liners, helps to elevate this a bit above the usual B-grade screwball fare.



Faux fiend the final:



A Walking Nightmare feints at setting itself up as a comic zombie movie, but the two specimens of zombiedom amount to little more than lobotomized deer (hi, Faith!) meandering aimlessly around. There isn't even a supernatural explanation; it's just a couple guys who've turned stupid, without first enjoying the pleasures of a bagful of airplane glue (or a tankful of propane). That may be tragic, but it's hardly frightening.



Unless you count Joan Woodbury's hair and outfit. That's some scary shit.

Friday, September 20, 2013

Avenging Mom with fire

We didn't plan it this way, but our next two films have a remarkable amount in common:
  • distinctive and intriguing titles;
  • mothers preoccupied by witchy thoughts of revenge, and daughters who get caught up in their schemes;
  • scenes of fire and catharsis, in which the movie's proletariat is at last invited to let loose;
  • murky plots that left us scratching our heads over certain key details;
  • and, courtesy of Mill Creek, terrible transfers with very bad sound, which surely don't do the movies in question any favors.
So in this spirit of ennui and motherhood, let's dive in:



Chloe, Love is Calling You (1934)

Grade: F



As Kelsey Grammer would say, "Oh, dear Lord."

Let's get this out of the way up front: the only saving grace of Chloe, Love is Calling You is the historically significant footage of the Shreveport Home Wreckers. Their performance, though brief, is certainly a highlight.



Otherwise, this atrocious melodrama in the "one drop of black blood" vein manages to be both offensive and boring, which is no small feat. Olive Borden (in her final screen role) is almost plausible as Chloe, a girl who yearns to escape the not-entirely-loving arms of her mother, the voodoo priestess Old Mandy (Georgette Harvey). Old Mandy fled after her husband Sam was lynched many years ago, and now she and Chloe have come back to their old home.



Chloe's decidedly unmelanistic appearance is explained by the fact that she's allegedly "high yella", or mixed-race. And okay, it's not inconceivable that Olive Borden could be mixed-race; she looks more Joyce DeWitt (or Gilda Radner) than Lena Horne, but whatever.  But this guy?



Yes indeed: they chose Philip Ober, best known as "the guy who married Vivian Vance and beat her up", to play Jim Strong, the movie's second mixed-race character. (What kind of person would beat up Vivian Vance, for God's sake?)  Mr. Ober was many things, but a plausible non-Caucasian was not one of them, and even in 1934 one has to imagine his casting must have elicited giggles in the audience.

Jim is utterly besotted with Chloe, and even wrestles dead alligators on her behalf to prove his love:



But she'll have none of it, and instead pines for local plantation foreman Wade Carson (Reed Howes), who returns her affections -- but doesn't realize she's black. (Cue dramatic music here.)

Still, Chloe and Wade fall madly in love, leaving poor Jim out in the cold. A noble soul even so, he saves Wade's life not just once, but twice, and barely gets a thank-you in return.

(He could've at least sent a card. One imagines that the local gift shop in Chloetown would've had "Thanks for saving me from murderous minorities" stocked in both A1 and A7 sizes, since every non-white character in the movie except Chloe and Jim is either servile or treacherously homicidal.)



Now, Wade has recently started working for the genteel Col. Gordon (Francis Joyner). Years ago the Colonel lost a daughter, Betty Ann, under mysterious circumstances: she was presumed to have drowned, but her body was never found.  (You can probably see where this is going.)



The chief roadblock in Chloe's road to happiness (and not-black-ness) is Old Mandy. She holds Col. Gordon responsible for Sam's lynching, which some reviews of the movie seem to take at face value. But racist though Chloe, Love is Calling You is, it's not Birth of a Nation, and as far as we could tell the sequence was actually meant to be:
  • Col. Gordon fires Sam (probably for stealing, since the movie makes a point of showing Wade confronting a pre-existing workplace culture of employee theft);
  • Sam attacks Col. Gordon, knocks him unconscious, and escapes;
  • then an unspecified group of "folks" pursues, catches, and lynches Sam, without the Colonel's knowledge or encouragement.
Not that it made a big difference to Sam, of course, but the bottom line (we suppose) is that Old Mandy is taking revenge on the wrong man. And in fact, there's a little hint of "the cycle of violence ends here" in the movie's closing scenes, when the Colonel pointedly notes that he wants to prevent a second lynching.



At least Chloe, Love is Calling You is short. But it's terrible, and thanks to the poor audio and shaky picture, it's literally hard to watch.  So unless you're interested in black screen presence in early talkies -- or in the Shreveport Home Wreckers -- avert your eyes and ears, and be the happier for it.





The Long Hair of Death (1964)

Grade: D-

As a wise man once said, "OH, NO! NOT THE BEES! NOT THE BEES! AAAAAHHHHH! OH, THEY'RE IN MY EYES! MY EYES! AAAAHHHHH! AAAAAGGHHH!"



Or, perhaps more to the point: "BITCHES! YOU BITCHES!"



Barbara Steele plots and schemes her way through this mediocre Italian gothic tale of murder, revenge, and creepy (though not terribly convincing) medieval dungeons. The film opens on a rather festive note, as an accused witch flails about in the midst of a flaming maze of hay bales and cross-shaped scaffolding. A stylish change from the typical crone-on-a-stick set-up, we thought.



Meanwhile, upstairs in the castle, the woman’s eldest daughter Helen (Steele) endures the sleazy advances of the local nobleman, who promises to spare mom in exchange for a little rapporto carnale.  It makes no difference, of course: the crispy witch expires, but not before cursing the village and imploring her two daughters to avenge her death.



Revenge, however, will have to wait. Helen is abruptly offed by the Count in the next scene (to the outrage of Steele fanboys everywhere, we’re sure) and the other daughter, Elizabeth -- just a child, at this point -- is, perversely, entrusted to the Count’s household. Keep your enemies close, we suppose, or pray that Stockholm syndrome does its magic.

All this is a prelude to the real action, which takes place a decade or so later amid the Black Death or some similar plague. Elizabeth (Halina Zalewska), by now a petulant, sulking sourpuss of a woman, is married, against her will, to the Count’s son Kurt (George Ardisson) -- a boorish Shatner lookalike with a penchant for frilly shirts and pig-headed chauvinism.



Things aren't going so well for Elizabeth, but soon the requisite dark and stormy night blows in a mysterious figure -- why, if it isn't good ol' Barbara Steele, back from the great beyond! At least, we guessed it was the great beyond. Here is where things got somewhat murky (murkier than the terrible Mill Creek print, if you can believe it). Now Steele claims she's a traveler named Mary, and everyone in the household seems to go along with this fiction (except poor old Count Humboldt, who keeled over from the shock). Not even a flicker of recognition from Kurt, the staff, or, significantly, her own sister.



Plot hole, or lost in translation? Who knows or cares, because soon the film turns into a long, slow, murky slog to the finish. Kurt, predictably, falls under the spell of the mysterious Mary, who seems to oscillate between wanting it and not (women, right?), and the two of them eventually plan to do away with Elizabeth permanently. There's a ton of gabbing around the dinner table, skulking in dungeons, mooning about the bedroom, and a generous helping of not getting on with things.



Other reviewers of this film (and there are many) seem to fall into two schools: first are those who agree that, yes, it does get rather dull in the middle -- but that it's not really relevant, because Barbara Steele is just such a talented actress. Then there are those who rabidly insist that no, what you plebes call dragging is actually mood and atmosphere and a building sense of dread.



As to the latter, all we can say is that we tend to love films where nothing much happens (Idaho Transfer, anyone?), but there's a difference between good atmosphere and pea soup. As to the former? No accounting for taste, we suppose. It is our expert and informed opinion that both sets of reviewers enjoy this movie for precisely one reason. Well, two reasons.



Inexplicably, nobody else seems to be bothered by the score, which is heavy-handed, mind-numbingly repetitive, and by its presence alone threatened to put this film firmly in "F" territory. We decided on a "D-" simply because we were genuinely curious about how things would all turn out. Though reminding us not unpleasantly of a similar denouement in a more recent film -- and there is something vaguely Summersisle about all the women, it should be said -- ultimately, we were left feeling unsatisfied. Next time the Italians have a zany adventure, we'll make sure they bring a big tomato sauce.